When international media (including movies, fashion shows, advertisements and other TV programs) convey the same messages to the global audience, people argue that the expansion of international media has negative impacts on cultural diversity. What is your opinion?
Nowadays, as international media companies expand across the world, some media programs (TV shows, movies, fashion shows) are becoming more and more popular, which lead to worldwide interest. Many people have strong view toward this trend. I believe that globalization through the media has many advantages. However, it certainly poses a threat to cultural diversity.
On the one hand, international media is a source of useful knowledge and information. It gives people the opportunity to gain a deeper understanding of the diverse cultures and lifestyles in the world. They can exchange languages and habits of different cultures so that they understand each other easily, helping people from all over the world to get closer, reduce social prejudice among nations. Besides that, international media paves the way for different countries to build relationships base on cultural understanding. For example, Asia was a once mystery to the rest of the world due to differences in cultural customs and religious beliefs. Over time, thanks to local government open policies and international media, the number of Asians living and working in different parts of the world has increased.
On the other hand, international media deliver messages that can hinder cultural diversity. As a matter of fact, people are tending to imitate the lifestyles of other cultures. For example, young people, especially teenagers are copying the customs of famous stars appearing on shows. This trend makes everyone same to be same and eventually lose the cultural identity of a nation.
In conclusion, media has double-edged impacts on the society (while it profoundly enhances people’s knowledge, its detrimental impacts on the community are thought-provoking). From my perspective, people should not go in deep with it but entertain it within the limit to avoid its drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-21 | HOÀNG DUY TRƯỜNG | 78 | view |
- More and more companies are allowing employees to work at home Do you think this is a positive or negative development 61
- Some people think that environmental problems are too big for individuals to solve Others believe individuals can also do some things to solve these problems Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- When international media including movies fashion shows advertisements and other TV programs convey the same messages to the global audience people argue that the expansion of international media has negative impacts on cultural diversity What is your opi 78
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why this is the case and what be done to attract more local people to visit these places 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, so, while, for example, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44290657439 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0589213844 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612456747405 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.053766865 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3125 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0625 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311544259644 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934115101435 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667379621646 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173376114164 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047323969905 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.