The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between
1920 and 2000.
The graph shows us a comparison between the birth rates of China and the USA from 1920 to 2000. Both two countries saw considerable fluctuations in fertility, low during 1965 to forward and high during the 1950s.
China birth rate raised from 10% to 15% and fell to 5% in the first 20 years. It was followed by a significant growth that the birth rate of this country reached a peak of 20% in 1950. The latter half of the century, however, there was a sustained reduction in this figure.
The fertility of the USA started with approximately 10% in 1920. This figure fluctuated a little in the first 20 years. It was not until 1940 that this country witnessed a considerable decline in fertility, from 10% to 5%. The birth rate of the USA then peaked up to 15%. From 1960 to 2000, there was a sustained decrease in this figure.
Although the figures of the two countries are nearly the same in 1920, in the final year of the period, there was a huge gap between the fertilities of China and the USA.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-11 | thaiha123 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | bemoichoianhyeuem | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-31 | teulimin.06 | 67 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | trucvy112233 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-04 | dhq.testbig | 78 | view |
- The two figures below show the rate of criminal convictions among men and women of different ages in the UK and the proportion of male and female prison inmates in the British prison system summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fea 78
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 61
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their level of health and fitness is decreasing What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them Give reasons for your answer and include any 61
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century so protecting them is a waste of resources To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 817.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.41621621622 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51884932046 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513513513514 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.0739217137 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.2727272727 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8181818182 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.54545454545 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287925618816 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124046769079 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.150433236951 0.0843802449381 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191448668288 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0705304179282 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.8 13.2329268293 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.06 11.4140731707 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.16 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.