The lecturer has explained few points to refute the claims mentioned in the passage.
First of all, the author of the passage claimed that the Chevalier was not wealthy because he had borrow some money from Swiss merchant. However, the professor explained that it is true that the Chevalier has taken loan from Swiss merchants but that doesn't mean that he was poor. The Chevalier has to sell land and convert the amount into money and during that time he required money and that is the reason why he had borrowed money.
Secondly, the paragraph mentioned that the conversations recorded in the memoir is inaccurate because it was written many years ago. Though, the professor provided important details about these conversations which refute this assumption. For instance, there were many witnesses who confirmed that the Chevalier used to write down everything by keeping notes.
Thirdly, the author of the passage pointed out that the Chevalier had many political connections which helped him to free from jail by giving bribes to jailer. Notwithstanding, the professor provided more convincing argument to refute this point is that there were many other prisoners who had more powerful contacts than the Chevalier. She further explained that it could be actually true that the Chevalier was able to escape from roof by using a piece of metal because just after his escape the government had to repair the ceiling of the jail rooms.
All in all, the lecture and the passage had contradiction on same topic and therefore the passage is not conclusive.
- Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents Others however believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
- Governments should invest as much in the arts as they do in the military 55
- Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e mail correspondence Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity as well as protect the company from lawsuits Write a response in which you discu 50
- Fossil evidence indicates that the blompus an extremely large carnivorous land mammal inhabited the continent of Pentagoria for tens of thousands of years until its sudden decline and ultimate extinction about twelve thousand years ago Scientists have det 59
- A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting lethargy and other signs of illness After the recall the pet food company tested samples from the recalled food an 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'borrowed'.
Suggestion: borrowed
...hevalier was not wealthy because he had borrow some money from Swiss merchant. However...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'borrowed'.
Suggestion: borrowed
...hevalier was not wealthy because he had borrow some money from Swiss merchant. However...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 251, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...aken loan from Swiss merchants but that doesnt mean that he was poor. The Chevalier ha...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 134, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... because it was written many years ago. Though, the professor provided important detai...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, as to, for instance, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1312.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 257.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10505836576 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61603060058 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544747081712 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5011677848 49.2860985944 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.272727273 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3636363636 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3636363636 7.06452816374 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135232240603 0.272083759551 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0499884257243 0.0996497079465 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367154204656 0.0662205650399 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0574091329669 0.162205337803 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472418548822 0.0443174109184 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.