Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Employees must do a variety of tasks relate and sometimes irrelevant to their jobs. It is argued that it is better for workers to do a single type of work during work time or not. Many companies respond one person for multitasks, and each person does different tasks in a unique position. I believed it is not suitable neither for workers nor fo companies. There is a lot of reasons for this claim, which two of them, which have great importance elaborated hereunder.
First of all, doing different types of tasks caused the personnel to lose their attention and the number of failures increases. If every employee does a similar work every day, it will also increase the pace of the work. For example, consider two companies that are in the same field. One of them gives a lot of responsibilities to each worker, and the other one hires for each task an expert. After a few times, the first company faces many problems and errors, because of tiredness and lack of attention. Their pace will decrease, and these errors make employees very unsatisfied. They will feel they aren't smart, and they lose their confidence. On the other hand, the second one, doing as fast as they can without any mistakes because they get familiar with their single task.
Secondly, doing a single task in work time help to bring more creativity. One of the ways to become more creative is doing over and over a simple job and find out the problems of the way you have done and tried different ways to do that task. Try and error is the source of creativity. For instance, when I was in high school, I decided to find a way to solve a movement problem in physics class. I examined many ways found a unique solution for those problems.
To conclude, I disagree that doing many different types of tasks to do make workers more satisfied, because doing similar work all day long helps them to focus and accelerate their job and make them creative.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-05 | Zmx_6 | 90 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
- TPO33 integ 80
- TPO 33 Independent Writing Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects 60
- young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities 3
- TPO 35 In 1912 a bookseller named Wilfrid M Voynich acquired a beautifully illustrated handwritten book manuscript written on vellum vellum is a material that was used for writing before the introduction of paper The Voynich manuscript as it became known 70
- tpo33 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 603, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...s very unsatisfied. They will feel they arent smart, and they lose their confidence. ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: Try to
...d tried different ways to do that task. Try and error is the source of creativity. For ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 36, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ms. To conclude, I disagree that doing many different types of tasks to do make workers more ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 344.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59593023256 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4718654181 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520348837209 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7950078177 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.2105263158 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1052631579 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.10526315789 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334721645835 0.236089414692 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090824189826 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783973790639 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213402946953 0.150856017488 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531092154744 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 11.7677419355 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.1 10.9000537634 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.