In companies, promotions to high positions should be given to employees inside the company and not to somebody outside the company or new hiring. Do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that promotion to senior managerial vacant seats should be given to the inside experienced employees rather than recruiting the new one from the outside. I strongly agree with this trend and reasons to justify the same are scrutinized below with relevant examples.
To withstand in the market at top positions in their thick and thin time, it is indispensable for the companies to keep up their profit ratio in a rising mode. Besides this, only the internal workers are the ones who are aware of the valuable skills of the organization that maintaining their remarkable position in the market. Also, this expertise has a strong ability to resolve any kind of issues in minimum time. For example, it was published in fortune five hundred magazines that the top-ranked firms always prefer to give managerial seats to only their in house employees who are connected to the firm for a long time.
On the other hand, many technological establishment choose to hire a new younger professional from the outside for their business senior seats. The prominent reason is that the outsider person has a bunch of knowledge of the international factors with distinct reputed corporations that might be useful for earning more revenue. For instance, in India, many small scale IT firms hiring new professionals every year to update their level in many aspects to earn more income.
In conclusion, it is necessary for the organization to maintain its values in a tough time also, I firmly agree with the notion the Human resources should give first priority to their internal members and not to the outsiders.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-27 | Saumilshah62802@gmail.com | 61 | view |
| 2019-05-13 | sharath957 | 71 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 143, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a rising mode" with adverb for "rising"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...companies to keep up their profit ratio in a rising mode. Besides this, only the internal worker...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, if, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1344.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99628252788 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76374488999 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594795539033 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.4315863237 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.4 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158288103005 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0582682938985 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529984119078 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0888540153075 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442324442998 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.