Leisure is a growing industry, but people no longer entertain themselves as much as they used to because the use of modern technology has made them less creative. Do you agree and disagree?
Leisure is a growing industry, but people no longer entertain themselves as much as they used to because the use of modern technology has made them less creative. Do you agree and disagree?
It is argued that the majority of people not able to devote enough time to their recreational activities which are mandatory for the growing masses as they are closely attached to modern amenities and made them less innovative. I partially agree with the phenomenon and reasons for the same are described below with prominent examples.
To embark on, the prime reason regarding this scenario is over usage of social media and smart mobile phones. Compared to the past, the vast majority of people are attached to the advanced technological devices nowadays and try to spend their free time in using these instruments as they can easily find their near and dear ones on their favourite social sites. Because of that, they forget to give enough time in such activities which make them rejuvenated. For instance, it is published in one of the articles that in the world, the majority of people forget their healthier past leisure activities and highly connected to indoor video games and social sites that create them less imaginative like ancient people.
On the other hand, many people believe that using online platforms they can earn more money and enhance their knowledge as the world focusing on the usage of the internet to a larger extinct. Although many younger ones have not enough education, they can earn a huge amount of revenue by showing their talents on these platforms. For instance, the YouTube application is the main source of earning for many new beginners to earn money.
In conclusion, it is a fact that technology is always boosting with time. It is recommended that the masses should use these latest gadgets wisely.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-11-05 | MyNguyen | 74 | view |
2020-08-17 | Saumilshah62802@gmail.com | 73 | view |
2020-08-15 | duyanh93 | 95 | view |
2018-12-19 | Tarek El Habashy | 50 | view |
2018-09-06 | ramneek | 75 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 336, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...escribed below with prominent examples. To embark on, the prime reason regarding...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, regarding, so, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97402597403 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53573715007 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548701298701 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.956706815 49.4020404114 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.846153846 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6923076923 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07692307692 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348209234225 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131701486587 0.084324248473 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.184545710258 0.0667982634062 276% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255270834379 0.151304729494 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.30062878087 0.056905535591 528% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.