The column graph shows the rate of consumers(in three age groups) taking healthy food between 2011 and 2016.
The given column graph details the proportional change that happened over a period of 6 years from 2011 to 2016 in the context of consumption of nutritional and healthy food surveyed across three different age -groups.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that despite a few fluctuations, healthy food remained popular among teenagers. The other groups also witnessed some ups and downs but recorded the lowest proportional rate compared to the teenage group with the passing years.
According to the given illustration, leading the chart during the first two years, about 7 or more in every 10 teenagers liked the healthy food option. Followed next by the mid-group who slipped below the youngest group by just 5%. However, the last group(31 to 40) rose steadily by only 5% as opposed to 35% in the previous year.
Furthermore, 2013 and 2014 marked the year of the reverse trend. Whilst the youngest group fell back by 10 to 20%, an additional 1 in every 4 people in their twenties opted healthy diet, and a dramatic plummet dragged the last group by one-third of the previous proportion. However, by the end, the first group recovered the highest proportion of 68%, while the others dropped below by a quarter and half of the most popular group.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-27 | pris | 72 | view |
| 2020-02-16 | nguyenphthao99@gmail.com | 67 | view |
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today 78
- In some countries owning a house rather than renting is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or a negative situation 78
- The table below gives information about the employment sectors in which people from three age groups worked 84
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 78
- The diagram shows the proposed changes to Foster Road Write a 150 word report describing the proposed changes for a local committee 75
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1069.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97209302326 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64640944749 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651162790698 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0964501835 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.777777778 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8888888889 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.23603664747 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254936132246 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0856303343452 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786251084283 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151731435067 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0786212770544 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1069.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97209302326 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64640944749 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651162790698 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0964501835 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.777777778 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8888888889 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.23603664747 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254936132246 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0856303343452 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786251084283 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151731435067 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0786212770544 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.