The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
» Write at least 150 words.
» You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The table compares the top cell phone producers in terms of their global market share from 2005 to 2006.
As can be seen from the table, Nokia, Motorola, and Sony Ericsson experienced a global upward trend by varying degrees in their global market share. In contrast, the opposite tendency was true of the rest.
Nokia came top of the cell phone market share list, which accounted for one-third of the total market share with a rise from 32.5% in 2005 to 35% in 2006. Likewise, there was a significant increase of approximately 4% in the market share of Motorola in this period. The global market share of Sony Ericsson also grew to 7.4% in 2006 compared with 6.3% in 2005.
However, the proportion of the market share of Samsung fell minimally by nearly 1% to 11.8% in 2006. The 2005-2006 period also underwent a small decline from 6.7 % to 6.3% in LG’s global mobile phone market. Meanwhile, the market share of BenQ Mobile dropped to 2.4 % in 2006, half as much as that in the previous year. Finally, there was a decrease in others’ sales of 3% to 16.2% in 2006.
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The government should reduce the amount of money spent on local environmental problems and instead increase funding into urgent and more threatening issues such as global warming To what extent do you agree 61
- Some people believe that government money should be spent on important things rather than arts such as painting and music To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words You shou 73
- Some people think that there should be some strict controls about the noise Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 362, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
....4% in 2006 compared with 6.3% in 2005. However, the proportion of the market sh...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, likewise, so, third, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 888.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64921465969 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36565808111 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544502617801 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.1994680801 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.8 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275403648517 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126373237445 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712545433134 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185461965747 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0771331698292 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.