Some people think that schools should reward students who show the best academic results, while others believe that it is more important to reward students who show improvements. Discuss both views and give your own opinion?
Some people argue that schools should honor pupils who show excellent academic outcomes. Others, however, assert that rewarding students who show progress is more important. Both of the views will be fully analyzed as follows.
In the first place, there is no denying that there are a variety of reasons why only students achieving the highest grades deserve rewards. The first reason is that this can foster healthy competition among students. As a result, this encourages them to make their effort to achieve the highest scores. Another reason is that according to this way, students have more opportunities to continue to develop and nurture their talents. For instance, in high school, the highest achievers are selected to train thoroughly and to participate in national or international competitions.
On the other hand, it can hardly be denied that prizing students who make great improvement is much more reasonable. Firstly, this can give equal chances for all students to receive awards instead of only concentrating on those who get excellent marks. As a consequence, they feel motivated and strive to gain high scores. Secondly, by recognizing their efforts during semesters, students could show interest and increased participation in every class's duties and responsibilities. For example, teachers can simply pay a compliment as the recognition of their attempts. Therefore, Students’ pressure and anxiety on studying and sitting an exam may be lessened.
In conclusion, I find the latter more convincing. This can be well illustrated by the fact that it is better for schools to reward students who make academic improvements rather than those who accomplish the highest rating although this remains a source of controversy in the education field.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-25 | Nguyen Ho Khanh Duy | 61 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | Ieltsbg | 56 | view |
| 2022-08-21 | yencmvbhp27@gmail.com | 92 | view |
| 2022-07-29 | ulzzang | view | |
| 2022-07-29 | ulzzang | view |
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 61
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 52
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 92
- The government should reduce the amount of money spent on local environmental problems and instead increase funding into urgent and more threatening issues such as global warming To what extent do you agree 61
- The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words You shou 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40433212996 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9483513823 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613718411552 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.0357244549 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5625 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3125 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0625 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309139643327 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.093064791657 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0944877766388 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21206585788 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125137995756 0.056905535591 220% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.