Some people believe that unpaid community service should be compulsory part of high school programs (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children). To what extend do you agree or disagree?
One of the controversial issues among people has been the enforcing task for students in high schools to work in community services without having paid. This opinion has had both pros and cons. Despite some negative points such as adverse effects of imposing even some effective work on children, I have been concurred with this statement based on some reasons which will be explained later.
To commence with, this action of implementing compulsory community service for high school students, have gained some valuable lesson for the children. The first main one could be to teach them that having a satisfying salary has not been the only significant part of working. Although individuals have been working to earn a great deal of money in order to build their life, one another considerable aspect of working has been helping people without any expectations. This has propelled students to not only be aware of various horrible conditions in their own society, but also make them to feel content about themselves. For example, helping one another human-being by joining a charity event, definitely they would feel extremely satisfied that they were who have caused another person a joyful moment as well as obtaining information about their problems in order to do something about it in the future.
In addition, one another benefit of this function has been for students to be taught how to improve their skills not only to communicate to other people at those young ages, but also to heighten their working abilities. In other words, one of the main difficulties for humans when they have wanted to work after finishing their university, is the hardness of connecting to their co-workers as a team. This is because they have not educated how to be a member of a group and also to coordinate with them. Therefore, when a student has to work in some community service, they will be able to learn those qualities in order to be a better employee in their future career. Furthermore, they could be able to attain necessary skills in working to accomplish success in their up-coming days.
In conclusion, working without being paid should be an essential part of schools for children. This rule has been extremely effective to not only children to appreciate the main concept of their job, but also has gained them some practical knowledge which would be helpful for their future. For those reasons, I myself agree with the whole case of enforcing them to be in several obligatory unpaid jobs in their high school.
- Acid Rain 65
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be compulsory part of high school programs for example working for a charity improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extend do you agree or disagree 73
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 56
- living in cities or countryside is one of the main decision for humans to make discuss advantages and disadvantages for both of them and give your own opinion 73
- When cars and cyclists use the same roads there are often problems Why is this case What are the solutions 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, well, as to, even so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 41.998997996 174% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2103.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 423.0 315.596192385 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97163120567 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62394947627 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501182033097 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 652.5 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.2460405821 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.4375 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4375 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265605081631 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106022901334 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0816566383119 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188929461487 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464069337319 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.