There seems to be an increasing number of serious crimes committed each year. While some think the best way is to use the death penalty as a deterrent, many people believe that other measures will be needed. Discuss both sides.
Heavy crimes committed are becoming prevalent nowadays, which necessitates the involvement of serious measures. Some people point out that capital punishment should be introduced to deter these crimes while others consider humane ways of punishment more appropriate. This essay will discuss both sides of the issue and provides balanced arguments.
On the one hand, proponents of the death penalty have legitimate arguments. First of all, rehabilitation of certain criminals who commit atrocities repeatedly is almost impossible and there is no guaranty that they will stop doing crimes. Examples of homicidal maniacs murdering people even after serving the imprisonment are numerous. For example, a man who had been convicted for murdering his wife in the 1970s killed a mother of two after being released in the USA. Another argument is deliberate manslaughter an unforgivable crime that may cost the lives of many innocent people. Examples can be seen in Christchurch, New Zealand, where more than fifty Muslim worshipers were brutally killed in the mosque or in Oslo, Norway, where almost ninety youngsters who were celebrating the graduation of the school were blatantly murdered. In these cases, the death penalty is believed to be an effective way of preventing dangerous crimes and saving people’s lives.
By contrast, the opponents of this view point out that capital punishment should be prohibited and alternative measures should be used instead due to several reasons. The death penalty could simply be taken advantage of in countries where authoritarian and dictatorial regimes are in charge. In other words, politicians in these regimes hold their opponents responsible for a particular crime and sentence them to death. Belorussia, the only country in Europe with the death penalty being legal, and Saudi Arabia, where critics of the regime are easily executed are salient examples. Therefore, death punishment is considered to be banned internationally to protect innocent people in those countries.
In conclusion, considering the aforementioned views, it is clear that both sides have strong arguments. However, the only thing that unites both advocates and opponents of capital punishment is saving innocent people’s lives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-19 | limbutimbu | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-19 | limbutimbu | 61 | view |
| 2021-05-01 | Mdea | 78 | view |
| 2021-04-30 | solaz1 | 78 | view |
| 2021-04-30 | solaz1 | 85 | view |
- Advertising that targets children should be banned from our televisions To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- There seems to be an increasing number of serious crimes committed each year While some think the best way is to use the death penalty as a deterrent many people believe that other measures will be needed Discuss both sides 89
- Nowadays environmental problems are too big for individual countries or people to solve We have reached the stage where we need cooperation on an international level to protect the environment To what extent do you agree or disagree 95
- In contemporary society food has become easier to prepare Drawing on specific reasons and examples do you think this has had an impact on the way people live 67
- Some people feel that boarding schools where students or pupils live at the school during the term are an excellent opinion for children while other people disagree for a number of reasons Consider both sides of this debate and reach a conclusion 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, so, thus, while, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 13.1623246493 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1894.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52186588921 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92159411294 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594752186589 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0894635314 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.411764706 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1764705882 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05882352941 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 15.0 3.9879759519 376% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321220702141 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0947480983712 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578926875806 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178615689519 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642138951837 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, so, thus, while, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 13.1623246493 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1894.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52186588921 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92159411294 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594752186589 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0894635314 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.411764706 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1764705882 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05882352941 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 15.0 3.9879759519 376% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321220702141 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0947480983712 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578926875806 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178615689519 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642138951837 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.