The table shows the amount of waste produced by different countries in 1980, 1990 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table presents the number of waste products in six different countries in the years 1980, 1990, and 2000.
Overall speaking, Americans produced much more waste than any other country in the past, which was hundreds of times higher than the other five countries. On the contrary, the amount of waste produced by Ireland was the smallest and recorded a slight increase during the past 20 years.
Specifically, the waste produced by residents in the US in 1980 was almost 200 times larger than that in Portugal, which was only 9.9 million tonnes, and rose about 1000 million tonnes every 10 years from 1980 to 2000. Japanese produced the second-highest amount of waste annually of the six countries, however, the increase in the amount of the waste in the 1990s was slower than that in the 1980s. The amount of waste produced in Poland was only several millions of tonnes in 1980 and saw soft growth in the following 20 years.
In contrast, waste production in Korea decreased from 31 million tonnes to 19 million tonnes from 1990 to 2000, though there was no record in 1980. And the waste produced in Portugal remained virtually unchanged at the point of the three years. Ireland, as the least waste production country, produced only 0.2 million tonnes in 1980 and the amount increased slightly in 2000.
- Society is based on rules and laws It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted To what extent do you agree or disagree 90
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people who have been successful in society don t attribute their success to the theoretical knowledge they learned from their university Do you agree the theoretical knowledge is not as valuable as expected 84
- The efficient functioning of society is based on rules and laws Society would not function well if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, so, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 3.0 24.0651302605 12% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1093.0 1615.20841683 68% => OK
No of words: 224.0 315.596192385 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87946428571 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42337531705 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 176.041082164 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495535714286 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 302.4 506.74238477 60% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.60771543086 81% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9595886633 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.444444444 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8888888889 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246513401017 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133018542413 0.084324248473 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065985485063 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188761056217 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681519680709 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 50.2224549098 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 78.4519038076 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, so, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 3.0 24.0651302605 12% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1093.0 1615.20841683 68% => OK
No of words: 224.0 315.596192385 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87946428571 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42337531705 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 176.041082164 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495535714286 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 302.4 506.74238477 60% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.60771543086 81% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9595886633 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.444444444 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8888888889 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246513401017 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133018542413 0.084324248473 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065985485063 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188761056217 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681519680709 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 50.2224549098 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 78.4519038076 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.