Government should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Should the government concentrate on solving the immediate problems of today instead of trying to overcome the anticipated difficulties in the future? As far as I am concerned, I hold the view that the administration should not only try to solve the problems recently but also put endeavor to focus on the matters in the long run since both those issues would play great roles for the entire country.
To begin with, the official should pay much attention to some matters that happened immediately for the reason that those issues would influence the lives of residents as well as the development of the whole nation if they are not addressed in time. These problems may embody in the fields such as education, economics, business or transportation. For example, some countries have bad air and worse living circumstances since their ecological environment has been seriously polluted. In this case, the authority should take actions immediately such as closing some factories that produce serious pollution and calling for the public to cherish their living environment and so on. If the government fails to solve these problems in time, the whole country would suffer serious consequences like too many people may die since they live in a bad air condition for a long time. Therefore, the official should take action in solving problems of today without hesitation.
Moreover, the government should also pay much attention to some issues that would happen after decades. The reason I hold is that a country should not only think about the present, but also consider future development, because the future development determines a country's status. For example, nowadays many countries put much effort into developing the aerospace industry. We all know that the Earth's resources may run out one day. Under these circumstances, every nation is trying to explore other planets that will replace the Earth. Hence, if a country makes great progress in its exploration of outer space, it will have a special place in the international community progress with its exploration of outer space, it will also have a special status in the international community and will be able to unearth more resources on other planets. Therefore, the government should try its best to join discoveries of the future.
Finally, focusing on the immediate problems of today does not mean that governments cannot simultaneously devote attention to anticipated future problems as implied in the recommendation. Perhaps, a policy of increased attention toward immediate problems while at the same time devoting significant resources to solving future problems is the best policy. As this method would likely reduce the severity of many future immediate problems, even supporters of the recommendation should see the wisdom in such a proposal.
To sum up, no government should ever employ a policy of neglecting anticipated problems in favor of solving the immediate problems of today. In order to best position a nation for future stability, governments must employ both concern from immediate problems while also progressively working to prevent the aggravation of anticipated matters.
- summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they challenge the points that why critics have opposed the idea that Sinosauropteryx was feathered dinosaurmentioned in the reading passage 80
- summarize the points in the passage being sure to explain the discovery of the dinosaur described in the reading passage 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects Use specific reasons and examples to supp 93
- Providing Internet access is as important as other services such as building roads so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost 79
- summarize the points in the passage being sure to explain how they address the specific concerns about forest fires described in the reading passage 80
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, such as, as well as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 12.9106741573 209% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2660.0 2235.4752809 119% => OK
No of words: 503.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28827037773 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73578520332 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93050246565 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48310139165 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 846.0 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.3710304477 60.3974514979 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.15 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.438070066247 0.243740707755 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153862697722 0.0831039109588 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.159737492431 0.0758088955206 211% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.307573917953 0.150359130593 205% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146629324462 0.0667264976115 220% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 14.1392134831 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.8971910112 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, such as, as well as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 12.9106741573 209% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2660.0 2235.4752809 119% => OK
No of words: 503.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28827037773 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73578520332 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93050246565 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48310139165 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 846.0 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.3710304477 60.3974514979 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.15 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.438070066247 0.243740707755 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153862697722 0.0831039109588 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.159737492431 0.0758088955206 211% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.307573917953 0.150359130593 205% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146629324462 0.0667264976115 220% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 14.1392134831 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.8971910112 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.