Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y

Essay topics:

Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.

It is not uncommon for someone to argue that the government should focus on the current problems instead of solving the problems in the future. The proponent of the statement is that we live now, so we must careful for ourselves rather than our off springs. However, I disagree with it based on substantial development of the earth.

It is obvious that if we do not solve the urgent problem, the chance to save is bleak, not to say raising children. For example, when facing the financial crisis, people have to cut down trees to make economy developed. Although it does harm to the environment, if the government do not establish laws to push the economy, many people will die. So as for the threat which is vital to influence people' survival, it is better to take the current situation into consideration. If the government pays more attention to the anticipated problems which result from the deterioration of the environment, there would not be any change in the living standard.

However, when considering current problems which have no connection with the extinction of human being, I regard the future problems should be considered as well. There is a ancient Chinese story reveals the truth. It is said a person who catches the fish in a lake, both mature fish and immature fish, and in the next year he has nothing to eat. The story tells that maybe people will care about today's interest, ignoring the future risk, but they ought to think about the consequence they may meet in the future especially when today's merit is contradicted with the future problem.

Moreover, it is a self-serving consideration that the government only focus on current issues. Although we have no idea what future will be like, at least we should take care of our children, and our grandchildren, right? At the same time, the government also need to focus on the elder people and children.In conclusion, when facing the dilemma between the current problems and future ones, the government should balance importance for each, consulting various scholars as well as listen to citizens advice, only in this way can the government shoulder the responsibility for people.

In a word, I disagree with the statement that solving today's problems has priority than the future problems. But the actions the governments take should base on different premise, and they have to choose the better,

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-04-11 guozhishan 70 view
2023-11-02 sami18 79 view
2023-09-13 shekhar 66 view
2023-08-09 Fahim Shahriar Khan 66 view
2023-07-11 Jonginn 50 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user guozhishan :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 173, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... should be considered as well. There is a ancient Chinese story reveals the truth...
^
Line 7, column 308, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
... focus on the elder people and children.In conclusion, when facing the dilemma bet...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, as for, at least, for example, in conclusion, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1985.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 401.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95012468828 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74720397532 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511221945137 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.6600874778 60.3974514979 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.764705882 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5882352941 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.17647058824 5.21951772744 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295361419418 0.243740707755 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0933996448303 0.0831039109588 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867231274707 0.0758088955206 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178459370279 0.150359130593 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469951368151 0.0667264976115 70% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.