Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Governments are always involved with planning for the future, solving problems they face, and trying to develop the country the best way possible. The question is what choice they make. In my opinion, dealing with the problems that society will encounter will be easier and more effective if the governments focus more on solving the anticipated issues than immediate ones. I will explain my reasons in following paragraphs.
First of all, planning ahead and preparing for undesired events takes less time and money than solving them after they take place. For instance, during Covid-19 pandemic, one of the main debates was what would have happened if the world was prepared for a worldwide pandemic beforehand and had clear guidelines for it. Many scientists and experts asserted that if we had a plan for these situations, we would have had fewer casulties and less death and contamination rates. So, the governments could have spent less budget on solving the problems and the humanitiarian part of it would have been better, had governments planned ahead.
Moreover, problems of today would not exist if we thought about them and were prepared for them in the past. Focusing on future problems can help a society to develop with higher acceleration rate. In the beginning, it starts slow since less problems are dealt with but with the pass of time it will get better and better exponentially. This is due to the reason stated before that dealing with problems before they happen is easier, cheaper, and less time consuming.
Indeed solving todays problems are important. Society with many present problems are never happy and satisfied which is not good. If a government have multiple problems, it will not be able to perform properly. Also, choosing one of these perspectives depends on the countries' situation and the types of problems they are dealing with. Sometimes an immediate problem cannot be ignored or postponed for a future decision, like warfares or pandemics. Thus, the government needs to proiorotize their affairs and plan for each based on the circumstances. Therefore, governments should spend time and budget on taking care of immediate issue as well, however, I believe it should not be the primary and only focus.
In conclusion, considering the reasons I stated above, I think if governments are looking for a long-term sustainable thrive, they must focus on anticipated problems rather than immediate problems. Of course there are pros and cons to each of the choices, however, from my perspective, the positive points and long-lasting results of choosing future over present is more significant.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-11 | guozhishan | 70 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | sami18 | 79 | view |
| 2023-09-13 | shekhar | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-09 | Fahim Shahriar Khan | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Jonginn | 50 | view |
- Some people believe it is often necessary even desirable for political leaders to withhold information from the public Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns wit 60
- Claim When planning courses educators should take into account the interests and suggestions of their students Reason Students are more motivated to learn when they are interested in what they are studying Write a response in which you discuss the extent 54
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 238, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun problems is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... In the beginning, it starts slow since less problems are dealt with but with the pa...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
...r, cheaper, and less time consuming. Indeed solving todays problems are important. ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 268, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...ne of these perspectives depends on the countries situation and the types of problems the...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, i think, in conclusion, of course, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2211.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 427.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17798594848 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74931078723 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524590163934 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 674.1 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8262093015 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.285714286 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.21951772744 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281156556411 0.243740707755 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0902806127031 0.0831039109588 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0694994516069 0.0758088955206 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167349914407 0.150359130593 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0664771867211 0.0667264976115 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.