Air traffic is increasingly leading to more noise, pollution, and airport constuction. One reason for this is the growth in low-cost passenger flights, often to holiday destinations.
Some people say that government should try to reduce air traffic by taxing it more heavily.
Do you agree or disagree?
International travel has become the latest trend in this era among youngsters as well as adults. This trend requires building up of new airports and growth in low cost passenger flights which are more often destined towards places receiving high tourists’ inflow. However, I totally disagree with the view that the government should try to reduce air traffic by taxing it heavily.
Beyond any qualms there are number of logical reasons to support the growth of travel industry and the trend of going for international holidays. Travelling to holiday destinations has become quintessential pass time for most middle class families. For example, in today’s lifestyle when mostly both the members of most families are working in mostly corporate jobs, there is little quality time they spend with each other so by the end of the week most of the couples or families prefer to catch a flight for relaxing on a beach or climb up some trek and spend some quality time together. I don’t think that there is anything wrong with this trend as long as this is beneficial for both the customer and service provider. Tourism industry brings huge revenues for any state or a country. While when we talk about noise and pollution caused by construction of airports than it is not fair to implement tax of airport authorities for this issue rather the tax should be imposed on manufacturing and trading of low cost airlines that are responsible for causing air pollution and noise pollution.
While some may argue that construction of more airports and rapid growth of travel industry is likely to constitute for almost half of air pollution and noise pollution in future if the same trend continues for long. However, I believe that with the technological advancement it is not a big task for our aeronautical engineers to construct cost effective and less pollution causing aircrafts in future.
In conclusion, I believe that taxing the airlines industry is not a permanent solution to this problem as long as people need a break from their busy lifestyle and thus continue to travel more occasionally. Instead the solution is to bring more cost effective and less pollution causing aircrafts to prevent the root of this problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-18 | ankita.hpgdc | 67 | view |
| 2021-01-18 | ankita.hpgdc | 73 | view |
| 2020-09-14 | ankita.hpgdc | 73 | view |
- Some people think that spending a lot on holding wedding parties birthday parties and other celebrations is just a waste of money Others however think that these are necessary for individuals and the society Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Some people think that a sense of competition in children should be encouraged Others believe that children who are taught to co operate rather than compete become more useful adults Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your 61
- Air traffic is increasingly leading to more noise pollution and airport constuction One reason for this is the growth in low cost passenger flights often to holiday destinations Some people say that government should try to reduce air traffic by taxing it 73
- Although some individuals believe that coed schools are better for the child overall development but others argue that separate schools for boys and girls should be constructed 73
- There are many female students who finish degrees in science and technology courses at university but few move into the workplace after they graduate Why is this What measures can be taken to encourage them into work 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 393, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ve and less pollution causing aircrafts in future. In conclusion, I believe that taxing ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 42, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'airlines'' or 'airline's'?
Suggestion: airlines'; airline's
...n conclusion, I believe that taxing the airlines industry is not a permanent solution to...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 207, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
...s continue to travel more occasionally. Instead the solution is to bring more cost effe...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1857.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 371.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00539083558 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73536436958 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525606469003 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 569.7 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.1410498307 49.4020404114 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.846153846 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5384615385 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07692307692 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363657244049 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1185574761 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0852754221616 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214138133613 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.076268717767 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 50.2224549098 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.