The chart below shows the price in Euros of 800 grams of four types of bread in one European country from 2001 to 2006
The provided data enumerates the cost of 800 grams of four types of bread (Wholegrain, Brown, White, Rye), calculated in Euros, in the European nation between 2001 and 2006. As is observed, both Brown and Whitebread increasingly became more expensive, whereas the changes in the prices of Rye and Wholegrain were marginal.
As far as the details are concerned, Brown and White bread initially cost 0.6 Euro per 800g in 2001. Over 4 years, the figure gradually grew to roughly 1.6 and 1.3 in 2005 respectively, although there was a slight decrease of 0.2 Euro in the price of Brown bread in the 2003-2004 period.
It is also conspicuous that the value of Wholegrain bread soared significantly to 1.8 as compared to where it initially started - 0.8. Despite this fact, the figure experienced a consistent reduction and finally ended up right at exactly the price it had been 4 years ago - 0.8. As for Rye bread, 800g cost 0.6 Euro in 2001 and there was a slight increase which made it cost 0.7 Euro in 2005.
- Some people prefer shopping in shopping centers while others prefer local markets What are the advantages of each Which shopping experience do you prefer 89
- Directors and managers of organisations are often older people Some people say that it is better for younger people to be leaders To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- There is no need to go out to see live cinema because it is better to see them on the TV or computer screen Do you agree or disagree 84
- Nowadays, animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, so, whereas, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 832.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72727272727 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6558479992 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 100.60139164 43.030603864 234% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 166.4 112.824112599 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.2 22.9334400587 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242379895589 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132784198136 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0855101592498 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161912284422 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432372793176 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.2329268293 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.33 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.75 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.