As the number of cars increases, more money has to be spent on road systems. Some people think the government should pay for this. Others, however, think that the drivers should cover the costs. Discuss both views and present your own opinion.
As the result of soaring traffic volume, it is assumed that the party who should be responsible for road maintenance is the government, while many argue that car-owners should share the responsibility. On one hand, I am inclined to believe that the state provides increasingly benefits to infrastructure. On the other hand, hardly can we deny the role of drivers.
To assess the impact of the government, we must bring national budgets into perspective. Assuming each individuals have a portion of their income deducted as a revenue for the national budgets, that amount of money can be allocated to various sectors, which includes transportation. Not only will sewer drains be better built so that flash flooding does not clog them, but the street network will also be able to adapt to the increase car number. Either new lanes or overpasses, for instance, can be added to alleviate traffic congestion. Another reason why the government should pay for these projects is that the authority in control of the country should be responsible for the life quality of its citizens.
Although so far, one can readily draw the conclusion that the citizens do not play a big role, we must put their responsibility into focus before judging whether they can exert an influence. Via toll charge, commuters are able to contribute a considerable amount of money aside from their income tax. Therefore, when the government is not the only one to bear the construction cost, there will be financial constraint, ensuring the focus is on the quality instead of the expenditure. On top of that, as the amount of car fee gets exorbitant, more people are discourage to own the personal vehicles and would turn to public transports as their daily means of getting around.
Taking both sides into consideration, they point me to the conclusion that both the government and each citizens should work in tandem. From where i stand, the government is still more effective as far as distribution and approriate use of fund are concerned.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-10 | Manideep Macherla | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | ozair | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | ozair | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-19 | xiao_alatus | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-01 | lehonganh1212 | 73 | view |
- Some people think that sports play an important role in the development of society Others think they are nothing more than a leisure activity Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Advertising is all around us it is an unavoidable part of everyone s life Some people say that advertising is a positive part of our lives To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The graph below shows the changes in the percentage of households with cars in one European country between 1971 and 2001
- Directors and managers of organizations are often older people Some people say that it is better for younger people to be leaders To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- It is commonly believed that nowadays main factors that affect a child s development are media pop culture and friends A different point of view is that family plays the most significant role Discuss both views and give your opinion 90
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 148, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...izens should work in tandem. From where i stand, the government is still more eff...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, therefore, while, for instance, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1685.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01488095238 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91999172713 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589285714286 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.626981366 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.357142857 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225633765882 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0673579772394 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543558182323 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129741642465 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374447271157 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 148, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...izens should work in tandem. From where i stand, the government is still more eff...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, therefore, while, for instance, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1685.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01488095238 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91999172713 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589285714286 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.626981366 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.357142857 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225633765882 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0673579772394 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543558182323 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129741642465 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374447271157 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.