The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year 2016 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year, 2016.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The pie chart illustrates the money received and spent for children’s charity in USA, for the year 2016.
Overall, it can be seen that the revenue collected for the charity program exceeded the expenditures. The contribution of food was the highest donation received whereas the highest amount spent was on the program services.
On the one hand, the food became the highest income source with 86.6% and another like community contributions was the second highest means of donation at 10.4%. Also, 2 percent of program revenue was added to it. In addition, government grants and invested income was similar at 0.2 % and rest remaining amount was from miscellaneous part.
On the other hand, Whilst the expenditure made on fundraising was more 1% than the management and general purpose though, the least expenses were spent on the management and in general use. However, the major part of donation was used for program services. In all, the total saving after expenses was $3,37,394 of the one year 2016.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-07-09 nemcutehotme view
2022-02-04 nguyendangquang.aspect 78 view
2022-01-03 TUAN MINH 78 view
2021-07-23 Sanaullah97 78 view
2021-03-14 asmita acharya 87 view
Essays by user mehjabin :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 300, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...all, the total saving after expenses was ,37,394 of the one year 2016.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, second, so, whereas, in addition, in general, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 843.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07831325301 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66042182959 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566265060241 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.2689799577 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6666666667 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.22222222222 5.23603664747 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148775159747 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724965831842 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108698301812 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133582206194 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135286321614 0.0819641961636 165% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.