Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. to what extent do you agree or disagree? what others measures do you think effective?
There is no denying that, increasing in number of vehicles and air pollution from it is becoming crucial problem to the world. However, some people suggest that upsurging price in petroleum product can reduce traffic and pollution, but, in my opinion, there are many other effective way to solve this problem. This essay will examine arguments in both topics.
To begin with, raising the price of petrol cannot reduce the amount of car on the road, I believe this is inappropriate way to resolve the problems. For example, we had seen much ups and down in the price of petrol many times, but the number of vehicles are in increasing trend, even the drivers or owners are in coping situation for every matters. People use this product most because of convenience availability and suitable price, as well as, most of the manufacturer produce vehicles with petroleum features and people have trust in this types of transportation. Similarly, the price of petroleum product directly make effect on world economy, by which we had already seen many times cold war between develop countries. So, I believe that, soaring price on petrol is not effective way to reduce problem related with pollution and traffic.
Secondly, in spite of, rising price, world can give emphasis on alternative car and make more availability, like, charging car and try to develop trust with these product with world. Likewise, convenience charging station, pricing of product, advanced vehicles with this features, reducing tax in this product, can be more effective than increasing price of petroleum product. Moreover, improvement of public transport and making easily availability can encourage people to use more public vehicles, this can led to reduce traffic jam. Improving facilities in public transport and imposing higher tax as luxury item on personal purpose vehicles can be more effective way to encourage people to use public vehicles.
In conclusion, increasing price in petrol cannot be effective way to reduce the problem of pollution and traffic jam. Hence, every government should think more effective and creative way to reduce this problems and world must be united to reduce these types of environmental problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-30 | asmita acharya | 61 | view |
| 2020-09-30 | asmita acharya | 67 | view |
| 2020-09-30 | asmita acharya | 73 | view |
- In future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne 73
- The graph gives information about drinking habits of the US population by age Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 78
- The charts below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main 78
- The bar chart below shows the distribution of different income groups of men aged 25 44 in Sydney according to whether they were born in Australia or overseas Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wher 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 7, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
There is not denying that, increasing in number of vehicles ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 28, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: increasing
There is not denying that, increasing in number of vehicles and air pollution from it ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er of vehicles and air pollution from it is becoming crucial problem to the world...
^^
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... the problems. For example, we had seen much ups and down in the price of petrol man...
^^^^
Line 3, column 537, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...oleum features and people have trust in this types of transportation. Similarly, the...
^^^^
Line 4, column 158, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this product' or 'these products'?
Suggestion: this product; these products
...rging car and try to develop trust with these product with world. Likewise, convenience charg...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 266, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...cing of product, advanced vehicles with this features, reducing tax in this product,...
^^^^
Line 5, column 197, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...re effective and creative way to reduce this problems and world must be united to re...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, likewise, moreover, second, secondly, similarly, so, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, in spite of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1859.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23661971831 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70136879643 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49014084507 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 599.4 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.5223691865 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.785714286 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3571428571 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172340446339 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.08301603265 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0767998672006 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138032964478 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512446785606 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.