Government should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extends do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Government should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extends do you agree or disagree?

Some people say that railways should be taken investment more than roads by the government. This essay agrees with this statement because if people use railways more that will prevent traffic congestion and reduce the expense of the journey and road transportation.

People always have an argument about traffic jams in any cities that may be prevented with the development of railways. If the railways are developed well then people can go anywhere faster than cars because people will not intent to buy cars and that will assist to drop traffic congestions. For example, Individuals would not get into stressful traffic after an exhausting workday, therefore they want directly to go home that impossible with cars to have a peaceful journey. If they have an opportunity to take a train or metro, it maybe obtains a more relaxing journey but this is also related to the development of railways.

Another reason is that traveling by car or bus always more expensive than any vehicle of railways. After improving railways, people might take a chance to have a journey cheaper way, and that also valid for companies who want to convey their loads inexpensive way. For instance, there are a number of studies by various governmental bodies that show that railways play an important part in the global economy. This may be due to the fact that use less energy, money, and more loads convey capabilities than road transportations.

In conclusion, my personal view is that if the authorities want to prevent traffic jam, get rid of the traffic's stress and fall to expense of road transport and journey, they have to pay more attention to railways and make more investment in railroads.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-12-09 Komaldeep 61 view
2020-10-03 murtaza 73 view
2020-09-03 quynhnhi280103 89 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1410.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73232875797 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539007092199 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.6710089738 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.181818182 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6363636364 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.90909090909 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10943101003 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0520932220103 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557984492955 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0829893670324 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557898512718 0.056905535591 98% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.