The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar chart illustrates the change in the proportion of English and Wales families owning and hiring accommodation over a period of 93 years started in 1918.
Overall, the percentage of households renting home recorded downturn, while the opposite pattern was witnessed in that from having own home. In addition, the proportion of families in rented home, which peaked in 1918, was greater than its counterpart in owned accommodation.
The percentage of families living in their house in 1918 was about 22% which was approximately 4 times smaller than that figure in family living in rented house. Over a period of 2 years, the number of families in rented accommodation decreased, which lead to the increase in the other figure. Those figures remained stable before recorded a fall and a rise in the proportion of people living in rented home and own home, which figure were 60% and 40%.
In 1971, the percentage of household in owned accomodation was equal for its in owned accommodation, in 50%. That figure changed steady before followed the similar pattern which was in 1939 and 1935. The percentage of people in owned accommodation registered the greater with figure in 68%, about double as that from rented accommodation from 1991 to 2001. At the end of the period, there was a slight increase in the number of people in rented home, which made that figure in the rest of the population in the own home decreased.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-10-31 | phadode | 78 | view |
2023-10-28 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 67 | view |
2023-06-10 | Aung | 89 | view |
2023-01-21 | Behnaz.babayani | 78 | view |
2022-06-21 | baokhanh | 84 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1190.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 242.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9173553719 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78069392877 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471074380165 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 369.0 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.2 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 119.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.8 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167608495947 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827163445578 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043736027087 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123112793579 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213792998049 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.