Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is beyond question that today’s people are bombarded with a great deal of information which news resources release. While some believe that people should acquire valid information from restricted sources to be well-informed, I am thoroughly convinced that pursuing various news resources can lead to a better understanding of information. In what follows, I will pinpoint two underlying reasons.
The first vital aspect to point out is that each news resource provides distinct information which is not found in others. Indeed, some information is not covered in special resources because of the lack of professional journalist or devoid of sufficient finances to write about every news. Accordingly, if ones pursue especific resources over the course of a day, they will miss some significant information. As a case in point, I used to check the price of house in my hometown through a news agency that was reliable for years. Consequently, I decided not to check other websites, which was greatly disadvantageous to me because they did not cover the whole hometown’s prices. In the end, I lost some remarkable houses which were fitted to my budget in places that news agency did not report. Had I gotten information from various sources, I would have bought an inexpensive home.
The second noteworthy reason I would like to mention is that some news resources disseminate false information to absorb more readers or audiences. Indeed, justifying news is hard to be obtained by following limited news sources. Conversely, Checking diverse of sources enables people to compare news to authenticate their sincerity. In addition, If people gain their information from different resources, News agencies will endevour hard to prevent from spreading false news because of the competition between them. My father’s experience is a compelling example of this matter. He used to follow news from a channel on television that was biased toward a party. The channel was not respecting the audiences by propagating wrong news in favor of the party’s policy. After a while, my father decided to get information from other channels, which was beneficial for him because he noticed that he could compare information to prevent misleading news.
To sum up, in the light of the stated reasons above, one can readily conclude that not only does following different news resources leads people to have access to complete information in each area, but also they are able to compare the information of each resource to obtain authenticated news.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-11 | pedram1994 | 67 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by societyin the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support youranswer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In order to be well informed a person must get information from many different news resources Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In order to be well informed a person must get information from many different news resources Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 67
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, conversely, first, if, second, so, then, well, while, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 3.15609756098 475% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 35.0 5.60731707317 624% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 33.7804878049 198% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 3.97073170732 453% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2136.0 965.302439024 221% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 408.0 196.424390244 208% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23529411765 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 3.73543355544 120% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96838719985 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 106.607317073 208% => Less unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544117647059 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 664.2 283.868780488 234% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 1.53170731707 718% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 8.94146341463 212% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6794945016 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.421052632 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4736842105 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280099816897 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0881538247881 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586146664561 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185036089244 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040460921155 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 40.7170731707 273% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.