The table elucidates the figure of labour force and silk mills in England and Wales between 1851 and 1901
Overall, the number of workers had witnessed a sharp downward trend, however, the quantity of factories was negatively correlated
As a deep analysis of the disclosure of the chart, it is unambigously observed that in the 1851 it was the lump of labour. The number of employees decelerated from 130.750 to 109.869 between 1851 and 1861 , then, it decreased slightly to 91.412 in 1871. After having a significant lull to 67.904 in 1881, the number of labour experienced a mild decline to 49.025 and underwent a slight drop to 38.942 at the year 1891 and 1901
Giving a shufty on this period, it is explicit that in the year 1851, it was lack of workplace. A tremendous climb in the number of workplace was recorded from 272 to 761 on the decade, then it saw a moderate reduction to 693 in the year 1871. Followed by a growth pattern that was more varied the quantity of mills saw a modest growth of 9 from 693 to 703 in the year 1881, then it dropped noticeably to 663 and 623 on the next decade.
- Schools should teach children some academic subjects which will be beneficial to their future careers Therefore other subjects such as music and sports are not important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
- The table shows the number of employees and factories producing silk in England and Wales between 1851 and 1901 Link table https drive google com file d 1bN1Kakm812OcI3ntl5QQlne RNQC5d M view
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 73
- The table shows the number of employees and factories producing silk in England and Wales between 1851 and 1901 Link table https drive google com file d 1bN1Kakm812OcI3ntl5QQlne RNQC5d M view 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...130.750 to 109.869 between 1851 and 1861 , then, it decreased slightly to 91.412 i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.4702970297 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56291173983 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539603960396 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 40.0 22.4926829268 178% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.1037014471 43.030603864 198% => OK
Chars per sentence: 180.6 112.824112599 160% => OK
Words per sentence: 40.4 22.9334400587 176% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25208062868 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122528678328 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754420254985 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153654182425 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0810717637638 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 13.2329268293 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.72 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.53 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.0 10.9970731707 164% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.0658536585 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.