The graph below presents different economic fields which gave income for Morocco in 2003 also the beneficiary from fishing during 1982 and 2003 period.
Looking at the graph it is clearly seen that tourism was the field that gave the most income for Morocco with 26%
while in contrast agriculture stood at the bottom with just 2%.
Based on the difference in number we can divide into 2 groups, sectors with high number and sectors with low number. On top, the difference between economic fields wasn't clear. Tourism accounted for the highest number of 26%, right behind was industry with just 2% lower. Then worker's remittance had the proportion of 21% (5% lower). On bottom, we see another trend between categories. Petroleum and fishing had just a slight difference in number of 1%, however the difference increased to 11% compared with agriculture at the lowest position.
By and large, the number of the sector on top was not so high (26%), however, at the lowest point the number stayed at just 2% which was a small number.
- Countries with a long average working time are more economically successful than those countries which do not have a long working time To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people think young people should be free to choose their job while others believe that they should be realistic and think about their future Discuss both views and give your opinion 87
- the pie charts and table gives information about the total value and sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000 67
- Many people think that some individuals are naturally good leader Others think that people can learn leadership skills Discuss both views 56
- Internet technology means people no longer need to travel to foreign countries to understand how they live Do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ave the most income for Morocco with 26% while in contrast agriculture stood at t...
^^^
Line 6, column 165, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
... the difference between economic fields wasnt clear. Tourism accounted for the highes...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 278, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
...d was industry with just 2% lower. Then workers remittance had the proportion of 21% 5%...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, then, while, in contrast, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 860.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85875706215 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38924943851 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576271186441 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.1289122266 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5555555556 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.44444444444 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171147075234 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0767163091302 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122009632043 0.0843802449381 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117580101183 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.152113043916 0.0819641961636 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.