The reading and lecture about let it burn policy which maen that forest burn themseleves out quickly without causing damage. the author mentions three types of damage caused by the let it burn policy. the lecturer casts doubt on claim made in the lcture. She says, the let il burn policy is considered as natural ecosystem cycle.
First of all, the writer blieves the let it burn policy like that occure in the yellow stone fire lead to damage the park's tree, and now seemed like devastated wasteland. This point challenged by lecturer. She elaborate, after damage of these trees, there is a high apportunity ti other trees to grow, in addition to the growing of smmal plants which can not be survive withe the yellow stone trees.
Second, the author says, thereis animals damage from the fire, furthermore, small species were probably unable to run away. The professor rebuts this argument. She suggests, when the small planta grow, the small animals can grow also, moreover, increase in the number of the predetors which prey these animels, so strongly provide a new food chain.
Lastly, the author states, these fire that lead to destroy all the yellow trees might decreasethe value of park as a tourist attraction, and the visitor decided to stay away. The professor in the other hand, illustrate, this fire does not occur every year, so there is enough time for these tree to grow up agian, therfore there is no effect on the tourist attraction.
The reading and lecture about let it burn policy which maen that forest burn themseleves out quickly without causing damage. the author mentions three types of damage caused by the let it burn policy. the lecturer casts doubt on claim made in the lcture. She says, the let il burn policy is considered as natural ecosystem cycle.
First of all, the writer blieves the let it burn policy like that occure in the yellow stone fire lead to damage the park's tree, and now seemed like devastated wasteland. This point challenged by lecturer. She elaborate, after damage of these trees, there is a high apportunity ti other trees to grow, in addition to the growing of smmal plants which can not be survive withe the yellow stone trees.
Second, the author says, thereis animals damage from the fire, furthermore, small species were probably unable to run away. The professor rebuts this argument. She suggests, when the small planta grow, the small animals can grow also, moreover, increase in the number of the predetors which prey these animels, so strongly provide a new food chain.
Lastly, the author states, these fire that lead to destroy all the yellow trees might decreasethe value of park as a tourist attraction, and the visitor decided to stay away. The professor in the other hand, illustrate, this fire does not occur every year, so there is enough time for these tree to grow up agian, therfore there is no effect on the tourist attraction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-14 | talelaldabous | 66 | view |
- The reading passage and lecture about farming of wild tuna the readind passage claims there are several problems faced tuna farming Th lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article He has contraversal ideas To begin with the author states femal tuna do no 80
- The reading passage and lecture are both talking about declination of liiterature reader in these days The passage claims there are several negative effect by reducing in reading literature The lecturer in the other hand casts dout in claim made in articl 71
- The reading passage and lecturer are both discussing one painting which was or was not painted by Rembrandt The author claims three reason to explain that this paint was not for Rembrandt The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article He says that all 61
- Teachers are a paramout factor foryoung people education Good education enable people to get a dream future career The quetion is whether universities should speend money on salaries for universities professors or not This can be weighed in many aspects A 60
- The reading and lecture about the working four days a week instead of five days a week The author beileives that four days work a week is good option The lecturer casts doubts on the claim made in the article He thinks that full time work is better First 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading and lecture about let it bur...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ves out quickly without causing damage. the author mentions three types of damage c...
^^^
Line 1, column 215, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...amage caused by the let it burn policy. the lecturer casts doubt on claim made in t...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...considered as natural ecosystem cycle. First of all, the writer blieves the let...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... survive withe the yellow stone trees. Second, the author says, thereis animals...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 305, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n the number of the predetors which prey these animels, so strongly provide a new...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... so strongly provide a new food chain. Lastly, the author states, these fire th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, lastly, moreover, second, so, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1205.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 249.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83935742972 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29850834119 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602409638554 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 372.6 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.6288229035 49.2860985944 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.416666667 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.06452816374 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.41557976347 0.272083759551 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168563674499 0.0996497079465 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.210756421451 0.0662205650399 318% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266732810698 0.162205337803 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.347390208041 0.0443174109184 784% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.