Some people think that in the modern world we are more dependent on each other, while others think that people have become more independent.
As the impacts of modernization become palpable, there are various modifications in particular individuals’ lifestyles. Some argue that human has been more reliant on one another, while others are divided on the inverse statement wherein this phenomenon has engendered a high-autonomy state in the population. Both viewpoints are rationales, but I personally lean toward the latter school of thought.
On the one side of this argument, in this modern society, the workload and job requirements, irrespective of any profession, have been on the increase. Because of them, all individuals might engage in teamwork activities whether or not they have other preferences. Take the production line for example, although almost workers would be responsible for specific parts, they need to cooperate with others to make all the stages of the production run constantly. Only by adopting these cooperative factors, can a sustainably tremendous development exert. As a result, the more developed advancements are, the more inextricable relationships among humans boost.
On the other hand, owing to the advent of technology, independent life is more accessible. As a matter of fact, ready access to these high-tech implement has facilitated instantaneous demands. For instance, during the quarantine time, most regular tasks have been transformed into the online platform and not require any partnership. Moreover, the multitudes are likely to opt for establishing themselves as a freelancer whereby work in a self-governing manner and not restricted to rules, environment, place, or time. Human beings tend to appreciate their privacy and self-determination than any time in the history.
To my mind, people rely on machinery or gadgets than on human relationships in the modern life. To exemplify, the Internet has helped people to connect unlimitedly to all information in the world, and to support these search engines such as Google, Yahoo, Bing was born. Effectively, when they have troubles, they would search on Google first, not any relationship surrounding them.
In conclusion, notwithstanding some certain dependent aspects, I would opine that the counterparts are far weightier.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-05 | Tung lam | 84 | view |
| 2022-10-16 | HaleyLin2000 | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-25 | ngocvuong | 61 | view |
| 2021-11-13 | kimngan5623 | 80 | view |
| 2021-11-09 | tranthuy | 56 | view |
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn 61
- The line graph below provide information about the incomes of four restaurants in a city in 2010 84
- The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening courses at an adult education center in the year 2009 89
- The graph below shows population variation in three wildlife species from 2011 to 2016 in North America and its coastal areas Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Children engaged in paid work 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 221, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...als might engage in teamwork activities whether or not they have other preferences. Take the p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 435, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a self-governing manner" with adverb for "self-governing"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...themselves as a freelancer whereby work in a self-governing manner and not restricted to rules, environmen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as a matter of fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1859.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6163141994 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33175514768 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643504531722 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1459938579 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.352941176 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4705882353 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.05882352941 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22546243419 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594958669109 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572012744667 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105201643565 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322848408741 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.