Some people think that the best way to reduce crime is to give longer prison sentences. Others, however, believe there are better alternative ways of reducing crime.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
On the account of mitigating the delinquency rate, people have different views about whether the government should sentence longer and sterner imprisonment or implement the other optimal solutions. Both views are justifiable, but I lean towards the latter school of thought.
On the one side of this issue, stricter punishments will undoubtedly act as a deterrent to curb the local crime rates. As a matter of fact, not only could the longer prison sentences generate fear of detention in criminals’ mind, it also discourages them from becoming an offender again after reintegrating to the society. During the time in the prison cell, the violators would have opportunities to get rehabilitated owing to various penalizations such as corporal punishment which are rigidly implemented inside. That is to say, those harsh sanctions could obsess their psychology and partly deter them to violate the law in the future.
On the other hand, albeit with the merits of high imprisonment, the other critical strategies should be prioritized on the government agenda. To embark on, the authorities could enact the non-custodial convictions such as heavy fines in response to local safety improvement. This cost-effective sanction is likely to enhance the awareness of each individual, which much more ameliorates the delinquency rate. Moreover, education on violations of the legislation and sufficient employment are also quintessential factors regarding the aforementioned dilemma. For example, if a child is provided proper education about social vices, they are not likely to become a villain when they are mature. Likewise, a person who is occupied and has a stable life would be kept away from crimes.
All in all, local safety improvement is not solely addressed by lengthening the penalties. In lieu of that, a range of alternative mentioned proposal should be applied or accompanied in order to become the most efficacious approach to hinder the crime.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-17 | teacher.anh | 92 | view |
| 2022-04-28 | vananhxh2005 | 61 | view |
| 2022-02-23 | Lunar Tran | 61 | view |
| 2021-08-18 | lennie.butera | 84 | view |
| 2021-01-31 | Sprios_D | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows the spending on research into renewable sources of energy in four countries between 1975 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening courses at an adult education center in the year 2009 89
- The following graphs depict the reliability of print and non print academic materials as voiced by undergraduates and postgraduates at 3 different British universities Summarise the information by selecting reporting the main features and make comparisons 70
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 78
- The graph below shows the cinema attendance of people on different days of the week in 2003 2005 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 59
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, likewise, moreover, regarding, so, then, for example, such as, as a matter of fact, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1654.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40522875817 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12486660829 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647058823529 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6110907193 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.142857143 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10351756502 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0299549096562 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0348906340702 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0656648889295 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396058797512 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.