The graph chart illustrates the representation of India, China, Usa and Japan in the total world population in the years 1950, 2002 and an estimation of 2050. At a glance USA is the only country that is not going to have the same tendendy to 2050 than the previous years.
On the one hand, both countries China and Japan have a decrease tendency. While China started with an almost 22% of the percetage and would represent the 15% by the year 2050, Japan in 1950 represented almost de 5% of the population and have a future trend of almost 1% by the year 2050. On the other hand, India will increase their representation from 15% in 1950 to almost 20% in 2050. Finally, USA, that decreased from almost 7% in 1950 to 5% in 2002, will reamain this number by the year 2050.
To conclude, it is possible to deduct, that in the future, while some countries as USA and China maybe will not so many population problems, Japan will have some natallity issues and India overpoblation.
- In some countries people spend long hours at work Why does this happen and it is positive or negative development 67
- The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006 67
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 113, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... While China started with an almost 22% of the percetage and would represent the...
^^
Line 3, column 308, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 1% by the year 2050. On the other hand, India will increase their representation...
^^
Line 3, column 404, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...950 to almost 20% in 2050. Finally, USA, that decreased from almost 7% in 1950 to...
^^
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le some countries as USA and China maybe will not so many population problems, Ja...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, may, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 807.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5593220339 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55365981698 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531073446328 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2243944306 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.285714286 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2857142857 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213385834446 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11219235777 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0791240370492 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155753362603 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0877474588101 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.