The graph below shows the number of tourists visting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where revelant.
The line graph provides a breakdown on how many tourists visited a particular Caribbean island over the period from 2010 to 2017.
A cursory at the graph is enough to make it clear that after the period shown, the number of visitors staying on cruise ships surpassed the figure for people visiting and staying on the island.
As can be seen from the diagram, there were nearly 0.25 million visitors staying on cruise ships when visiting this island. After this year, this number fluctuated between 0.25 million and 0.5 million till 2013. Then, it steadily increased to 2 million in 2018.
As the diagram suggest, roughly 0.75 million visitors staying on the island during the time dropping into in 20. The next year witnessed stability in the number of people staying on the island when visiting. Subsequently, this figure rose gradually to 1.5 million in 2013. After 2013, it stayed unchanged at this point in 2015. From 2015 to 2016, it decreased moderately, but recovered to climb to 1.5 million in 2017.
In addition, the figure for total visitors to this island showed a significant growth through the period from 2010 to 2015. Then, it underwent a stability between 2015 and 2-16. After that, it continued going up to 3.5 million in 2017.
Overall, the number of tourists visiting a Caribbean island staying both on land and on cruise ships showed an upward trend over a 17-year period from 2010.
- The charts below show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and town B in 1960 2010 67
- Some people think that books should be stopped in school and that videos films and computers should be used instead To what extent do you agree 84
- People live longer today and so people should stay in the workforce longer To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end world poverty and hunger Others say that economic growth is damaging the environment and should stop To what extent do you agree 56
- The diagram below shows the process of using water to generate electricity for human use 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1168.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 240.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86666666667 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3897785811 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491666666667 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.5638186456 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.4285714286 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1428571429 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.14285714286 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17056287693 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643721050225 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636014827292 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117706801215 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640860627901 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.91 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.