The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of
developing countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006
to 2010.
The table illustrates how much money was donated to developing countries in
the period 2006-2010, by US and EU charities, to support technological
development.
Overall, it is clear that total aid increased during this period. US aid was
considerably higher than that from other donor countries.
There was a significant increase in the total aid given, from $15.7 billion in
2006 to $24.3 billion in 2009, rising sharply to $30 billion in the following
year. US charities provided most of this money, with a rise in aid each year
from $9.7 billion in 2006 to reach a peak of $22.7 billion in 2010.However, contributions from other charities also increased. In EU countries,
charities gave $3.3 billion in 2006 and then aid grew slowly to $3.8 billion in
2008, followed by a slight fall in the next year, before rising again to reach $4
billion at the end of the period. Charities in other countries also provided
increasing aid. Despite a similar fluctuation to EU charities in the amount
given each year, donations went up from $2.7 billion in 2006 to reach $3.3
billion in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-18 | minhphambinh1234 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | minhphambinh1234 | 67 | view |
| 2022-01-25 | Lê Quỳnh Mai | 67 | view |
| 2021-05-28 | Chu Thị Hải | 67 | view |
| 2020-11-21 | nguyen duc | 73 | view |
- The diagrams illustrate the design of a single and double room study area 73
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010 73
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010 73
- The chart and table give information about what nursing graduates did in the UK in 2009 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 64, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
... to reach a peak of 2.7 billion in 2010.However, contributions from other charities als...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... next year, before rising again to reach billion at the end of the period. Charit...
^^^
Line 12, column 1, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...xt year, before rising again to reach billion at the end of the period. Charities in ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90760869565 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82649976082 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54347826087 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3005328572 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.875 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 13.0 3.83414634146 339% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.403945568988 0.215688989381 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.196311618835 0.103423049105 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106083389899 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145317353861 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074062770684 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.