You play a team sport with some friends. Last week a member of the team had an accident and wasn't able to play with you at the weekend. You decide to write to him in hospital, telling him about the match.
Write a letter to your friend. In your letter,
tell him which team won
describe the conditions on the day
say how you felt about the match
Dear Frank,
I was so sorry to hear about your accident! I hope you are feeling a lot better today and that it is not too boring in the hospital.
The match on Saturday was disappointing. The score was two all, probably because you were not there to score that extra goal! The awful thing was that we were winning until 10 minutes before the end when suddenly they scored another goal. I was so shocked when I saw the ball hit the back of the net.
I think the weather was to blame. It was a wet day and the pitch was very muddy. By the end of the game, you could hardly see the grass and we were sliding around in the mud. Everyone was exhausted.
Let us know when you are going home and we will arrange for someone to bring you to watch the next game. The rest of the team send their regards and we all wish you a speedy recovery.
Best wishes,
Charlie
- The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
- More people than ever before travel to other countries than ever before. Why this has happened? Is this a positive development or negative? 84
- In the modern world, it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is it a positive or negative development? 84
- Fossil fuels are the main sources in many countries but in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged Is it positive or negative development 93
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment. What can governments do to address these problems? What can individual people do? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ere not there to score that extra goal! The awful thing was that we were winning un...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, as to, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.48453608247 200% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 4.92783505155 41% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 5.05154639175 99% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.03092783505 198% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 32.9175257732 73% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 26.3917525773 61% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.85567010309 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 703.0 937.175257732 75% => OK
No of words: 169.0 206.0 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.15976331361 4.54256449028 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.78020617076 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 1.99533786643 2.54303337028 78% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 127.690721649 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.639053254438 0.622605031667 103% => OK
syllable_count: 211.5 290.88556701 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.41237113402 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.13402061856 66% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 1.44329896907 69% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6804123711 87% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 16.3608247423 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9652934859 44.8134815571 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 63.9090909091 76.5299724578 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3636363636 16.8248392259 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.63636363636 4.34317383033 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.49484536082 268% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109561108151 0.216113520407 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.039488781904 0.0766984524023 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437823310086 0.0603063233224 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0792646008242 0.12726935374 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047311783653 0.0580467560999 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 5.8 8.37731958763 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 70.7449484536 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 7.45979381443 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 6.26 8.71597938144 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.16 7.59969072165 81% => OK
difficult_words: 19.0 41.2886597938 46% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 8.62886597938 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 8.54432989691 94% => OK
text_standard: 6.0 8.15463917526 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.