One of the most important issues facing the world today is a shortage of food and some think genetically modified foods are a possible solution.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
As the world population has risen to 7 billion, we are increasingly struggling to put food on the table. Organic food growth is slow and cannot catchup with the population sharp incline. So some people suggest that genetically engineered food can solve the food problems and I completely agree with this point of view.
We are already reaping the benefits of engineered food in our daily lives. Take boiler chicken for instance, which only takes 45 days to become fully grown, is meeting the meat demands of billions of people around the globe. If we had only relayed on the organic chicken which normally takes 4 months to become mature, people would not have that much meat available in the world right now. Thus, modification in the genes of species enables us to accelerate the natural growth cycle and helped us to meet our daily food needs.
Furthermore, there are some revolutionary genetically modified foods products are in the pipeline which may completely eradicate the food shortage. In U.K, scientists performed a successfully experiment in which they cloned the meat cells with in the laboratory which means we can double the available meat through cloning. If this experiment has no side effects on the food and people health, this product production can be maximized at industrial level. This will not only solve our food needs, but also has a potential to provide green food with zero carbon foot prints on the environment.
To conclude, with the high growth in human population over the recent few decades, food is becoming a scarce resource. In order to tackle this pressing issue, I suggest we should go towards genetically engineered products. These products are not only being issued in our daily lives, but their demand will rise exponentially in the near future as they have potential to solve people food needs once for all.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-09 | jagrit sharma | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-09 | jagrit sharma | 67 | view |
| 2021-07-09 | jagrit sharma | 89 | view |
| 2021-07-09 | jagrit sharma | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-09 | jagrit sharma | 61 | view |
- With an increasing overweight population some people think universities should make sport a compulsory module on all degree courses To what extent do you agree 67
- One of the most important issues facing the world today is a shortage of food and some think genetically modified foods are a possible solution To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Farming is the backbone of every country but now a days many youngsters hesitate to enter in this profession Why is the case and what can be done to avoid it 67
- Write a letter to one of your classmates and invite him to a class reunion When and where is the party Give some details about what is going to happen at the party Tell him her what you have been doing recently 73
- Some people think that to learn a second language well it is necessary to live in the country where that language is spoken What is your opinion about this 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: K
...etely eradicate the food shortage. In U.K, scientists performed a successfully ex...
^
Line 3, column 177, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('successfully') instead an adjective, or a noun ('experiment') instead of another adjective.
... shortage. In U.K, scientists performed a successfully experiment in which they cloned the meat cells wit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, so, thus, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96463022508 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62552351435 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559485530547 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5038870294 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.285714286 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2142857143 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92857142857 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181370349532 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749666075537 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632775480253 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124938156216 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566175263401 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.