Men and women because of their inherent physical differences are not equally suited for many tasks Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address.
The world has long witnessed a contentious position on the categorization of tasks to humans based on their gender identification. This prolonged contention has generated enormous imbalance in providing free and equitable access to opportunities to both the male and female gender on the basis of their inherent physical differences. The presumptions which delineate the capabilities of men or women to unequal tasks on the basis of their musculo-skeletal structures is unfounded.
In times past, women purpose in the world are once believed to be reproduction and household chores which was based on their supposed physical strength -perceived as weakness in the world. As such, women are denied access to education with a prejudice that such opportunity will not be utilized by them during reproduction and household chores. This unfounded discrimination on women to education is one of the major source of the numerous world problems. Women in the world that have been given access to education have proven this prejudice otherwise as shown in their various innovations and achievements in the academic world. Notable examples are Marie Curie -a Noble Prize Winner- and the group of women which led the calculations for the successful and precise landing of Neil Armstrong on the moon. As such, the cognitive ability of women should not be misconstrued with their physical differences.
One of the most affected sector in the world is leadership -specifically, politics. Starting from the abysmal disenfranchisement of women to selecting their desired leaders let alone their ability to contest for political positions. Women has long been separated from the political affairs of the world. Nevertheless, the few women that strived to attain political positions in their respective have proven otherwise. A recent example is the role of women leaders in tackling the COVID-19 pandemic. The first and other few countries to be declared free of the coronavirus pandemic are being ruled by women -New Zealand and Norway are notable examples. It has also been discovered that the countries which prioritized the social progressive index -that is equitable access to opportunities and basic amenities- are also being lead by Women. The United Nations stated that Norway have over 70% chance of achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. It is pertinent to note that the longest serving monarch in the world -the Queen of England- have proven the unwavering leadership skills of the female gender.
However, there are some courtesy that are inherent to physical differences which opposing view may take away. Imagine a man and a woman in the same room and the woman is compelled to switch on the generator for the house. In the world we live in, it sounds illogical for a woman to take the lead in such task. This is not to demean the strengths of women but its only an inherent courtesy based on our gender.
Although, to achieve a world where everyone lives in peace and shared prosperity, every individual irrespective of their gender must be assumed capable for various tasks until proven otherwise
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-08-11 | Anish Sapkota | 50 | view |
2023-08-10 | Anish Sapkota | 66 | view |
2023-08-04 | DCAD123 | 50 | view |
2023-01-23 | Pranav Lohote | 66 | view |
2022-10-02 | motherastronaut12 | 58 | view |
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this period most of the complaints re 63
- Manned space flight is costly and dangerous Moreover the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men an 58
- A movie producer sent the following memo to the head of the movie studio We need to increase the funding for the movie Working Title by 10 in order to ensure a quality product As you know we are working with a first time director whose only previous exper 73
- Technology while apparently aimed to simplify our lives only makes our lives more complicated Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develo 83
- The first step to self knowledge is rejection of the familiar Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your po 96
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 668, Rule ID: NOBLE_PRIZE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Nobel Prize'?
Suggestion: Nobel Prize
...ld. Notable examples are Marie Curie -a Noble Prize Winner- and the group of women which le...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2614.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 500.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.228 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72870804502 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96134834155 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 835.2 704.065955056 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5435200899 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.652173913 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7391304348 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.26086956522 5.21951772744 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220556594 0.243740707755 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0667212941475 0.0831039109588 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438193996805 0.0758088955206 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12742566319 0.150359130593 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303273488853 0.0667264976115 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 100.480337079 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.