The graph below presents the employment patterns in the USA between 1930 and 2010.
The line graph elucidates five distinctive labor force employments in the USA, over a period of 70 years, from 1930 to 2010.
Overall, farming, fishing, and foresting works are drastically declined to the lowest point at the end of the year, despite, its peak that was experienced at the beginning, whilst manufacturing, sales, and office, technical employments are increased with the notable exception of other services.
To begin with, technical and industrial professions were in the lowest position in 1930, when marketings and office, as well as other services made up just 10 percent. However, sales and department work decreased to 0 percent, when technical and industrial works remained the same at this level. At the same time, other services have risen to almost 20 percent, but it again declined to 10 percent in 1950, when sales and office, technical services commenced climbing to approximately 20 and 30 percent respectively in 2010. Subsequently, industrial labor kept its lowest rate until 1960, then, it also considerably climbed to 38 percent.
Moreover, farming, fishing, and foresting employments were in the highest position, which was 78 percent, however, it lost its popularity by decreasing to 1 percent in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-02 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-15 | TAROH TRAN | 10 | view |
| 2023-01-08 | Abhishek Neupane | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-08 | Abhishek Neupane | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-08 | Abhishek Neupane | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows unusual water usage in millions of cable meters by industries in some countries 78
- Some people think that outdoor activities are more beneficial for children s development than playing computer games To what extent do you agree or disagree 96
- Water Usage Australia 71
- The diagram below shows how the instant noodles are manufactured Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The flow chart below shows an automatic photo booth Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 63
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, moreover, so, then, well, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1048.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34693877551 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98023825809 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591836734694 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.974735484 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.714285714 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1428571429 5.23603664747 194% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113584456623 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639000213802 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874918384238 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102190922624 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0986073730214 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.