The maps below show the village of Stakeford in 1930 and 2010.
The given maps illustrate the changes that appeared in Stokeford village over a period of 8 decades starting from 1930 to 2010.
Overall, it is clear that the village in Stokeford experienced considerable changes during the period shown. The most noticeable differences between the two maps are the disappearance of the farmland and the existence of housing areas.
As can be seen from the maps, from 1930 to 2010, on the western side of the road running along the River Stoke from the bridge to the south of the village, the post office remained unchanged. During the same period, two shops and the farmland were both demolished to make way for the broadening of the road and the construction of residential areas.
Turning to other features, we can see that on the eastern side of the road running from the bridge, the farmland in the northeast of Stokeford village was also destroyed and replaced by the appearance of many houses and the expansion of the primary school. To the south of the primary school, while the large house was expanded and became the retirement home, another housing area was constructed on the original site of the gardens nearby.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-02 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-29 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-07 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-07 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-04-13 | 123456abcxyz | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 73
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in 5 different countries in 2002 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 56
- The maps below show changes that took place in Youngsville in New Zealand over a 25 year period from 1980 to 2005 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 969.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89393939394 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61840802895 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.135064291 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.428571429 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2857142857 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.71428571429 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140716762206 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719169176454 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0820980904793 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109583214496 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0902968831228 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.