Table
The table illustrates the information about average distance in miles travelled by per person per year with different modes of travel in England in between 1985 to 2000.
Firstly, in 1985, person used to walk 255 miles but it reduced to 237 miles. Whereas, 51 miles covered with bicycle but it decreased to 10 miles per person in 15 years. Furthermore, 3199 miles were covered by car while, with the time use of cars had been went up to 4806 miles. However, 429 miles travelled per person by local bus but in 2000, approximately half distance declined by this mode.
Secondly, in 1985, people travelled less to long distance by bus which was only 54 miles while this distance increased to 125 miles. Moreover, nearly same distance covered by train in both year which was in between 280 miles to 380 miles. There was no significant change can be seen for taxi. While, other modes of travel was quite popular in England and 450 miles and 585 miles had been travel by this category in 1985 and 2000 respectively.
Overall, car, walking, local bus train were more popular while bicycle and taxi were less in trend in both year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-12 | wholemilk | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-26 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-26 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-10-25 | hien3112 | 67 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 928.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66331658291 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34919114223 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542713567839 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.107475765 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3 5.23603664747 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0336717868392 0.215688989381 16% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0146753447361 0.103423049105 14% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440260342084 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0366883618404 0.15604864568 24% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063546106754 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.