The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course. The table shows the salaries of the Anthropologists in work after 5 years.
The pie chart elucidates the destination of Anthropology graduates who graduated with their undergraduate degree course from one university, whilst the table illustrates the profits of them after 5 years' work.
Overall, the highest rates of students were busy with full-time works, when the lowest of them spent their time on part-time work, as well as postgraduate study, and the proportion of government sector employees who earn more salaries was the biggest compared to the private companies' workers, whose rate was the least.
To begin with, merely more than half the percentage of Anthropology graduates, that made up 52 percent highly preferred full-time works. However, part-time works made up 15 percent and the proportion of unemployed students was 12 percent. Subsequently, the full-time postgraduate study was 8 percent with the not-known cases respectively. The part-time work and postgraduate study were the lowest preferred with only 5 percent out of 100 percent students.
Moreover, the significant point is the rate of freelance consultants and government sector employees, whose salaries commences from 25000 to 49999 dollars was the monotony by 5 percent, as well as richer workers, whose profits commences from 50000 to 74999 dollars by 15 percent. In addition to this, 50 percent of government sector workers were the wealthiest employees, who earn more than 100000 dollars after their 5 years' work.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-08 | nguyendangquang.aspect | view | |
| 2023-10-05 | dhphuc7866 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-19 | steveminh | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-17 | Bùi Xuân Tiến | 50 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | Dipesh1234 | 73 | view |
- The diagram shows the relationship between a number of different languages 72
- The maps show the change of Petland from 1980 to 2007 82
- The pie charts below show the percentage of housing owned and rented in the UK in 1991 and 2007 73
- The diagram below shows how Olive Oil is manufactured 61
- Some cities create housing areas by providing taller buildings Others create housing by building houses on a wider area of land What solution is better 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, well, in addition, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1203.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44343891403 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93496734082 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542986425339 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 342.0 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.6809220841 43.030603864 183% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.375 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.625 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163199766402 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0868864016706 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126208670589 0.0843802449381 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145025831593 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.154570608478 0.0819641961636 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.2329268293 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, well, in addition, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1203.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44343891403 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93496734082 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542986425339 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 342.0 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.6809220841 43.030603864 183% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.375 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.625 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163199766402 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0868864016706 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126208670589 0.0843802449381 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145025831593 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.154570608478 0.0819641961636 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.2329268293 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.