The movement of people from the countryside into the cities is happening in many parts of the world, resulting in the problems, especially in cities. What are the causes of this movement, and how can it be reversed
It is irrefutable that several people from rural areas these days have a tendency of migrating to metropolises and this global phenomenon is allegedly the main culprit of numerous nerve-wracking issues, especially the urban problems. From my perspective, the movement of rural people results from various causes, and actions should be taken to reverse this trend
To initiate, there is a variety of explanations for the aforementioned movement. One fundamental justification is the inappropriate distribution of occupations. It does not seem unreasonable to claim that the majority of well-paid jobs are in megacities, thereby leaving countrysides with seasonal or low-paid works. Consequently, in order to earn a living, people living in rural regions are relocating to cities with the aim of seeking a life-changing opportunity. Another reason that is worth mentioning is due to the fact that infrastructures in urban areas are much more advance when compared to the rural regions. Therefore, people from the countryside hold the belief that they will have a higher living standard and have more chance to enjoy state-of-the-art facilities, especially in the medical and education fields, if they live there.
Unfortunately, there is no magic bullet for the rural depopulation. Nevertheless, certain solutions can be taken into consideration to reverse the movement of rural people. The straightforward and effective measure is to adopt decentralisation policy by relocating manufactories and some participate kind of workplaces to the countryside. As a result, people living in rural areas can have a suitable job without moving to the cities. On the second place, the government should spend more national budget on implementing and upgrading the infrastructure in the countryside. This will be the first step to improve the faith of rural people in the local services and they will have to think twice before moving to megacities in search of a better life.
In conclusion, the migration of rural dwellers is due to the uneven job distribution together with the gap in terms of facilities between two areas. Therefore, the rural depopulation can be reversed by relocating factories to the countryside as well as upgrading the infrastructure of these places.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-21 | longpham2k | 84 | view |
| 2022-02-21 | Awadhesh Mourya | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-18 | Gnaight | 73 | view |
| 2021-01-20 | longpm2k | 87 | view |
| 2020-02-04 | gulbakhyt_90 | 87 | view |
- In today s world of advanced science and technology we still greatly value our artists such as musicians painters and writers What can arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot 95
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of studying abroad? 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of unemployed graduates aged 20 24 in one European country over a two year period 84
- Nowadays it is not only large companies that can make films Digital technology enables anyone to produce films Do you think it is a positive or negative development 84
- In many countries young people leave rural areas to study or work in cities What do you think are the reasons for this Do you think the advantages outweight the disadvantages 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1920.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45454545455 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39441918619 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539772727273 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0692093641 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4666666667 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221505614043 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0680616305669 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789238516061 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136154285361 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536167914825 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.78957915832 174% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.