The table below illustrates the information about the methods Japanese teenagers listened to music over the last month. However, the pie chart compares the number of people who prefer recorded or live music.
Although It is obvious that the overwhelming majority of 70% of surveyed people prefer live music the most, they listen to this less than recorded one. However, a bit more than a quarter of teenagers like recorded music more, 26%. The remaining 4% of asked people do not have any certain preferences between live or recorded ones.
Despite the great number of japanese young people who love non recorded music, 79% of males usually use MP3-players to listen to music, whereas there are 60% of those liking live music. By contrast, almost one fifth of them use CDs. Nevertheless, the equal percentage of women chose both gadgets and live music to listen to music, about 40%. Additionally, CDs are less prefered among females too.
Overall, although most Japanese teenagers prefer live music more, they tend to listen to recorded one significantly more often.
- Some people think that computer games are bad for children, while others believe that they are useful. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of computer nad give your own opinion. 78
- The diagram illustrates how steel rods are manufactured in the furniture industry Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Eating sweet foods produces acid in the mouth which can cause tooth decay High acid levels are measured by low pH values
- Some people think that formal education should start for children as early as possible. While others think that it should not start until 7 years of age. discuss both views and give your opinion 96
- The line graph shows changing patterns of business communication in New Stratford from 1980 to 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 902.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.125 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52896444361 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602272727273 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.4990232728 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.222222222 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5555555556 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400194260326 0.215688989381 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18314577957 0.103423049105 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0863798443643 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.275613656521 0.15604864568 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105534830421 0.0819641961636 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.