In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food To what extend do you agree or disagree with

In certain countries, a lot of people are experiencing health problems as a consequence of consuming supernumerary of fast food. For that reason it is essential for governments to foist a higher tax on this type of food. In the following paragraphs, I will give some causes and reasons that determine whether I agree or disagree with this opinion.

Most people who like eating fast food reject this idea and as it has become a habit for them to eat regularly. As most of them are students and workers, they have to eat during their work time. If government taxes these food items, it will be a strong blow for them. Instead of it, governments should give a special knowledge related to fast food in order to aware that consuming too much fast food leads to many illnesses like cancer and obesity.

The number of people prefer fast food because of their taste and spending less time to prepare than other meals and some of them eat because if its inexpensive cost. Actually, people do not feel bad and inconvenient as soon as eating fast food. As they do not know that its effects to human body are not felt in a day or a month. It will be better if government inform people about the inside ingredients of fast food such as Ajinomoto which is mostly used in their preparations. According to specialists, we can call it slow poison to humans' health.

In conclusion, I completely believe that people never give up consuming fast food. Indeed, if they are taxed, people try to prepare them at home and anyway continue eating. Moreover, if they are conscious about their damage, they may not stop immediately, but try to reduce eating them on their daily lives.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, anyway, but, if, may, moreover, so, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1376.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66440677966 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58166251226 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55593220339 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3601836756 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7333333333 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.53333333333 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339898688945 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118992281089 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738300661813 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214692171867 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0890069663104 0.056905535591 156% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, anyway, but, if, may, moreover, so, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1376.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66440677966 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58166251226 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55593220339 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3601836756 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7333333333 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.53333333333 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339898688945 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118992281089 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738300661813 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214692171867 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0890069663104 0.056905535591 156% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.