Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country, while some people think it is bad. Discuss both views and state your opinion.
A part of crowd opines that it will be best for a nation to host an international sports event, while other part of crowd believes, it will be devastating for the nation. I believe, conducting such sports events will definitely strengthen the relationship of countries with each other which will prove advantageous for the host country.
To commence with, there are several reasons, on the basis of which, some people believe that hosting an international sports event is not good for a nation. The most central reason behind it is that they feel, such events might create a chaos. Since, sometimes audience become more aggressive when their country loses the game and such incidents create a disturbing situation. for instance, once India was hosting a cricket match, which was between India and Pakistan, when India was losing the game, someone from Pakistani audience made a bad statement, which turn that event into a war between audience of two nations. Hence, such situations might be devastating for the host country.
However, there are people who support the idea of hosting an international sports event. The most preponderant supporting argument by them is that it will provide a chance to the host country to strengthen the relationship with other countries. for instance, when people from overseas will visit a nation to enjoy the events then it will help them to understand and learn more about host country, while at the same time the host nation will get a chance to exhibit the hospitality to the guests. Secondly, it will take a country towards growth, since the host country will try to upgrade the play-ground and facilities to make it comfortable for players as well as for the audience to enjoy the game without any hinderance. certainly, a nation can generate the revenue from audience and can utilize that money for the upgradation of facilities.
in summary, undoubtedly, the benefits of conducting an international sports event are too good to ignore. I reckon, countries should host the games, since it is fruit-full in every way.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-07-02 | wardahoodo | 81 | view |
- The crime rate nowadays is decreasing compared to the past due to advance technology which can prevent and solve crime.Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because spend so much time on cell phones online games and social networking websites How far do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion 73
- We should invent a new language for international communication Do the advantages of this will outweigh the disadvantages 63
- Library should provide more books rather than invest in new technology such as e books and computers To what extent u agree 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 377, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...ncidents create a disturbing situation. for instance, once India was hosting a cric...
^^^
Line 3, column 245, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
... the relationship with other countries. for instance, when people from overseas wil...
^^^
Line 3, column 724, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Certainly
... enjoy the game without any hinderance. certainly, a nation can generate the revenue from...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ney for the upgradation of facilities. in summary, undoubtedly, the benefits of c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, as for, for instance, i reckon, in summary, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1721.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03216374269 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76092920423 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494152046784 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.840193468 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.928571429 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276852685688 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113187268492 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0924200732576 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178748376817 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0101139429166 0.056905535591 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.