In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
It is claimed that the number of vehicles on the roads will be reduced in a couple of decades. Although the car is a comfortable type of transport, I dare say that the pollution caused by it accompanied with high costs related to the ownership of a car will eventually reduce their presence on the roads.
To begin with, the usage of private transport is usually associated with comfortable traveling and the ability to move in any direction, such as the office in the city center or a gym on its boarders. Many people value comfortable traveling across the town, what significantly increases the number of drivers. Usually, people drive alone with no passengers. However, working late hours creates opportunities for those traveling by car in the evening, at the time when the traffic becomes light.
Nonetheless, the detrimental effect of the usage of cars outweighs its benefits. The use of personal cars leads to an increase in the pollution level and traffic in cities, which makes it uncomfortable for living. To be specific, the University of General Pollution published a study according to which the pollution level in cities with a population of over a million people increased by 32% for just last ten years. To counteract this tendency the government of Russia increased funding for plants creating environmentally friendly vehicles such as the project «Green Bus» in Moscow. By boosting the use of ecologically friendly vehicles the government reduces the harmful effects conjugated with the use of cars.
By the same token, the benefits of ownership and cost saving opportunities by using own car are greatly exaggerated. Driver may greatly reduce the costs associated with the ownership of personal auto, including insurance costs, petroleum, and maintenance of the car. To be specific, the National Community of Drivers calculated the amount of money needed to cover the costs of driving and published their findings. The results of the research clearly demonstrate that the real costs of ownership of a car are unseen for a buyer and may exceed the price of a car. For example, the new car may cost five thousand dollars while the costs of maintenance could be as much as half of the price. Practice of accurate cost accounting will eventually demonstrate the real costs associated with driving.
All in all, the ownership of an own car has both its positive and negative side effects. The car may act as a comfortable driving tool. At the same time, excessive driving may foster the development of pollution in large cities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 66 | view |
| 2023-06-23 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-13 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | prakriti malla | 73 | view |
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today 76
- People learn things better from those at their own level such as fellows or co workers than from those at higher level such as teachers or supervisors 73
- People learn things better from those at their own level such as fellows or co workers than from those at higher level such as teachers or supervisors 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- People learn things better from those at their own level such as fellows or co workers than from those at higher level such as teachers or supervisors 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, nonetheless, so, while, for example, such as, to begin with, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 43.0788530466 32% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2126.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 423.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02600472813 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89328672847 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503546099291 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 673.2 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2708239377 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.3 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.15 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164791888799 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556947314614 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408644792063 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0948334418736 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050110076741 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.