In this day and age, with the innovation of technology, there is more and more teenagers who opt for socialising online rather than face to face meeting. The advantages this means of communication has brought about as well as the trend it has set may responsible for this phenomenon and in the following essay, some solutions will be put forward to lessen the influence of this issue.
Since time immemorial, humanity used to interact with each other in flesh. However, with the invention of telephone and later on was the social media, the way we communicate has been significantly changed. This new form of communication is apparently more beneficial than the conventional one. It is not as inconvenient as face to face meeting which is often interrupted by a change in environment such as weather, location or human itself. An illustration can be given to this is a fact that an individual owning a hi-tech device can interact with the others whenever, wherever and no matter how harsh the weather is, even less time-consuming than conventional method which cost a considerable time to reach the place.
Another important reason is that it has become trendy for a teenager to possess an account on the social network. Most of the citizens nowadays can afford one, even your boss or your teacher so to keep yourselves up to date, it is essential for you to choose socialising online.
In order to tackle this phenomenon, restriction in the time youngsters spend on social media is of vital importance. It is unavoidable that when your offspring have too much time surfing the internet with no survelliance, they are likely to depend on social network and will not be satisfied with your suggestion to go out and meet the others in all likelihood.
A more feasible solution is encouraging youngsters to do outdoor activities. In order to bring this approach to life, it is plausibe to propagandize inhabitants about health problems entailed with on-screen interacting such as headache, backache or eyestrain. By doing this we can enhance the willingness to practise physical interaction which will alleviate the negative impacts of online interaction.
- Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 84
- We should introduce laws to make businesses and state services employ equal numbers of male and female workers in every department or area of the company 78
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in future Do you agree or disagree 77
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football while other people think that taking part in individual sports like tennis or swimming is better Discuss both views and give your own opinion 76
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person Give reasons f 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 260, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to socialise'.
Suggestion: to socialise
...date, it is essential for you to choose socialising online. In order to tackle this phen...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, however, if, may, so, well, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1808.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06442577031 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02966784337 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579831932773 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.3486891798 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.142857143 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.21428571429 7.06120827912 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198138185445 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065858385184 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393712892989 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104102782223 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0219008656832 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.