The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart provides information about Japan's and Malaysia's citizens' yearly spending in 2010.
Overall, the two nations' citizens experienced different patterns of spending. While the Japanese concentrated more on Transport and Other Goods/Services, the Malaysian prioritized Housing more.
About Malaysia's graph, similarly to a Japanese's expenditure, Healthcare only took up the smallest spending portion of a Malaysian, with only 3%. Nonetheless, Malaysians allocated more to Housing and Food, accounting for 34% and 27% of their spending, respectively. Transport consumed only 10% of Malaysian citizens' spending, being 2-fold smaller than Japanese people. Besides, 26% of Malaysia's citizens' expenditure was to purchase Other Goods/Services.
Regarding Japan's illustration, Japanese citizens focused the least on Healthcare as they spent only 6% on this purpose in 2010. Besides, 25% of Japanese citizens' expenditure was allocated to Food, while they spent an equal portion of 20% on Housing and Transport. Remarkably, people living in Japan prioritized other goods and services the most as this section consumed 29% of their spending.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-05 | nhinhi999 | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-19 | Sarina2021 | 40 | view |
| 2022-06-19 | Sarina2021 | view | |
| 2022-03-27 | Ahmed Z | 81 | view |
| 2022-01-20 | Vuthungan | 78 | view |
- School should not force children to learn a foreign language To what extent do you agree with this statement 56
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 73
- punished 67
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 153, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'citizens'' or 'citizen's'?
Suggestion: citizens'; citizen's
...rpose in 2010. Besides, 25% of Japanese citizens expenditure was allocated to Food, whil...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, nonetheless, regarding, similarly, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 979.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.93333333333 4.92477711251 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14768998629 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587878787879 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.1811236718 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.9 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102910018696 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529758602849 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.088755913369 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102633615867 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120652039034 0.0819641961636 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 61.2550243902 63% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.82 11.4140731707 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.