×Status message
New essay The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant has been updated.
Primary tabs
View(active tab)
Edit
Essay topics
The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Profile picture for user Ahmed Z
Submitted by Ahmed Z on Sun, 03/27/2022 - 12:29
The pie charts compare the percentages of money spent on five different categories in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.
Overall, the highest proportion of money went on other goods and services in Japan and housing in Malaysia.By contrast, expenditure on health care was
by far the lowest in both countries.
In terms of household expenditures, people in Japan spent their highest percentage of money on other goods and services, at 29%, which was 3% higher than that of people in Malaysia. However, 34% of Malaysian people's spending went on to housing which was roughly 1.5 times greater than the money spent by Japanese people. In case of food, the figures were quite similar for both Japan and Malaysia, at 27% and 24% respectively.
On the other hand, expenditure on transportation and health care were lower in proportions for both countries. In Japan, people paid out 6% of their money on healthcare, while Malaysian people spent half of Japanese. Furthermore, Japanese citizens spent double the percentage of money compared to Malaysian citizens on transport, at 20% and 10% sequentially in year of 2010.
- We cannot help everyone in the world that needs help So we should only be concerned with our own Communities and countries To what extent do You agree or disagree with this statement 56
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islipas it is now and plans for its development 59
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
- Happiness is considered very important in life Why is it difficult to define What factors are important in achieving happiness 61
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at Queen Mary Hospital since its construction in 1960 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 147, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... By contrast, expenditure on health care was the lowest in both countries. In t...
^^
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of food, the figures were quite similar for both Japan and Malaysia, at 27% and ...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Respectively
... both Japan and Malaysia, at 27% and respectively. 29% 10 On the other hand, expend...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 122, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eir money on healthcare, while Malaysian people spent only 3%. Furthermore, Japan...
^^
Line 11, column 269, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aysian citizens on transport, at 20% and 10% sequentially in year of 2010.
^^
Line 11, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ansport, at 20% and 10% sequentially in year of 2010.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 938.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15384615385 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84165285408 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521978021978 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.6694845726 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.222222222 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131801627337 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657383464307 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608247317804 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0954659084983 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663023900582 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.