Some universities requires students to take classes in many subjects. Other universities requires students to specialize in one specific
Universities, the place where we go to achieve higher degrees for being scholar on various subjects - depending on student’s desire. Some universities require student to take class in one specific subject, while other universities require to take classes in many subjects. In my opinion, taking classes in one specific subject is more beneficial for students to follow a suitable career in future and focus on the objectives of the specific subject.
First, students can easily focus on acquiring knowledge and information related to the specific subject they pick out at university. Truly, at university, students learn in-depth knowledge on subject, so they have to provide much attention, devotion and hard-work to reach the apex of learning, without that effort they just acquire shallow knowledge on the subject that would not be brought blessing in future. To illustrate, when I was a student of chemistry at university, I had to give a much time in order to make a good result by acquiring knowledge in chemistry. I think if I had to take other classes at the same time, it would have difficult for me to put much effort in chemistry plus other subject at the same time. Therefore, I feel that, possibly I could not achieve my learning goal in chemistry or would not be able to gain lots of information in chemistry that I did.
Second, focusing on a specific subject at university make students able to pursue a better career in future. For example, my brother who is a pharmacist, has been doing a decent job in Bangladesh right now. He just focuses on developing his career as a pharmacist, so he had to put a great effort in order to gain knowledge that includes how he can develop methods for producing new medicines or improving the existed method to be successful in his career. Therefore, right now, a multinational pharmaceutical company has called him. My brother believes that if he had focus on multi subjects at university, he would not able to be professional in pharmacy and unable to get such a lucrative job in today’s competitive job market.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that students should choose only one subject to learn in-depth knowledge on that specific subject, and to manage a high-pay job it is crucial for them to focus on a specific subject so that they can be more professional on that subject.
- Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harmful chemicals may be doing to the 68
- Humans have long been fascinated by elephants, the largest land animal in the modern world. Social animals that live in herds, elephants are native to both Africa and Asia. Their large ears, long trunk, and long life span have made elephants one of the mo 76
- Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland They date from the late Neolithic period around 4 000 years ago They are round in shape they were carved from several types of stone most are about 70 mm in diame 80
- Humans have long been fascinated by elephants, the largest land animal in the modern world. Social animals that live in herds, elephants are native to both Africa and Asia. Their large ears, long trunk, and long life span have made elephants one of the mo 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 240, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'taking'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: taking
...bject, while other universities require to take classes in many subjects. In my opinion...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 401, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ject that would not be brought blessing in future. To illustrate, when I was a student of...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 490, Rule ID: A_MUCH_NN1[1]
Message: Maybe you should omit the article "a", leaving only 'much'.
Suggestion: much
... chemistry at university, I had to give a much time in order to make a good result by ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 884, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of information in chemistry that I did. Second, focusing on a specific subject a...
^^^
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...students able to pursue a better career in future. For example, my brother who is a pharm...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 732, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... job in today’s competitive job market. In conclusion, I strongly believe that s...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, therefore, while, for example, i feel, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1948.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 399.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88220551378 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90989690539 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473684210526 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 627.3 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.2303401746 48.9658058833 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.142857143 100.406767564 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 20.6045352989 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339702129651 0.236089414692 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142017332335 0.076458572812 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.206841643516 0.0737576698707 280% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249895283868 0.150856017488 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.213159836229 0.0645574589148 330% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 11.7677419355 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.