Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs.
The author here believes that controversial topics shouldn't be discussed with those who have different point of view about that topic as this dicussion won't lead to any conclusion because most people stick to their core beliefs and don't refrain much after the discussion. I would like to disagree with his point of view.
Discussions and debates have been an integral part of humanity. People take part in various discussions not just to ridicule or win the argument but to share their opinion and get to know about others point of view as well. Many times people get to know some information that they didn't know earlier because of this discussion. This may lead to a change in their point of view as well. People refrain from changing their stand so easily. They are adamant. But this isn't the case always. Some people who lack knowledge about the topic tend to change their stand easily by taking part in a discussion and being moved by one of the sides discussions.
Moreover, taking part in a discussion is not always about pushing your opinion in others mind. Its not always about winning the debate. Its more about taking part in a healthy discussion and getting to know other point of view as well. Sometimes, because of our core believes we tend to support a wrong notion as well. But when we take part in a discussion we get to know about contrasting point of views. This broaden our thinking power. Its also true that many people who have gone too far in their idiologies won't just change their mind in just one debate or discussion. People tend to get impede. For example, a person with leftist idiology won't change his mid in one debate and become rightist the other day and vice versa. But taking part in a healthy debate makes them know the shortcomings of their ideology. It makes them know where they're wrong where others are right. This is the beauty of a healthy discussion. And eventually, maybe an extreme leftist can change his approach to rightist and vice versa if given strong points and comebacks in many discussions not just one. So its denegrate to refrain from taking part in a discussion with those who have contrasting views.
Discussion of controversial topic is really important as it makes us get to know contrasting views as well. Its not about changing your point of view. Its more about getting to know others point of view and getting more knowledge about the topic.
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this time period most of the complain 55
- The following appeared as part of the Dean s newsletter The University of Wabash is considering a community service requirement for all undergraduate and graduate students We believe that the objective of any university is to produce well rounded and char 60
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and s 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 65
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary Write a response in which you discuss 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 52, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...here believes that controversial topics shouldnt be discussed with those who have differ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 233, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... people stick to their core beliefs and dont refrain much after the discussion. I wo...
^^^^
Line 2, column 281, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... get to know some information that they didnt know earlier because of this discussion...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 465, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...d so easily. They are adamant. But this isnt the case always. Some people who lack k...
^^^^
Line 2, column 479, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...hey are adamant. But this isnt the case always. Some people who lack knowledge about t...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...ut pushing your opinion in others mind. Its not always about winning the debate. It...
^^^
Line 3, column 748, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r day and vice versa. But taking part in a healthy debate makes them know the sho...
^^
Line 3, column 844, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they're
...heir ideology. It makes them know where theyre wrong where others are right. This is t...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 108, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
... get to know contrasting views as well. Its not about changing your point of view. ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, really, so, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1985.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 423.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6926713948 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42244929668 2.79657885939 87% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.41134751773 0.4932671777 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 604.8 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.7364053814 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.5185185185 118.986275619 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6666666667 23.4991977007 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.18518518519 5.21951772744 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.83258426966 248% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34532044756 0.243740707755 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970886778432 0.0831039109588 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762517065126 0.0758088955206 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250810952968 0.150359130593 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601826411279 0.0667264976115 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 14.1392134831 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 48.8420337079 150% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 12.1743820225 56% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 12.1639044944 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.84 8.38706741573 82% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 100.480337079 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.7820224719 59% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.