The internet allows us to stay connected with each other no matter where we are. On the other hand, it also isolates us and encourages people not to socialise.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with these statements?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Today, we are completely immersed in a connected world, which has been realized thanks to the invention of the Internet. Even if this may represent an occasion to maintain relationships between people who are geographically distant, it could also bring some individuals to self-isolation and depression.
On the one hand, the internet is allowing people to remain connected to all the individuals they have met throughout their life. Thanks to social networks, we have the opportunity to meet again old friends, who, otherwise, we would not have seen again. An example of this is Aqylla, a Singaporean girl that I have met a decade ago in a sailing regatta. In 2019 she came to visit Milan with her family and, thanks to Instagram, she knew that I was living in Milan and we were able to meet again after a very long time.
On the other hand, internet may also be a dangerous resource. In fact, it is common, especially among lonely people, to use social networks to live through the adventures of others, such as models, actors and influencers. As a consequence, they tend to isolate themselves even more, gaining satisfaction by looking at others’ lives as they were living the facts reported in first person. For example, especially during the lockdown, many people have stopped thinking about themselves since they have started to live through Instagram stories and directs shared by famous people such as Chiara Ferragni, Fedez and Caterina Zanzi.
In conclusion, I personally think that Internet is an extremely useful invention, which helps to maintain connections among people, but it must be used wisely and consciously. In order to do so, users need to clearly understand the distinction between concrete and virtual reality, without replacing the former with the latter.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-16 | Irish25 | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-11 | Archana vijaya | 61 | view |
| 2021-04-04 | tranminh | 89 | view |
| 2021-03-08 | elisabetta_fedele | 84 | view |
| 2020-04-16 | ntngan14 | 89 | view |
- Techcorporation is our top pick for investment this term We urge all of our clients to invest in this new company For the first time in ten years a company that has developed satellite technology has been approved by the FTA to compete with the current sa 45
- The following appeared as part of a petition sent to residents of Youngtown by an environmental protection group The Smith Corporation should not be permitted to develop the land that is now part of the Youngtown Wildlife Preserve This sanctuary is essent 61
- One increasingly popular policy for promoting renewable energy is a feed in tariff Under such a policy investors on any scale from large corporations to individual homeowners produce their own energy from solar panels installed on their property Electrici 58
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime Others however argue that the circumstances of an individual crime and the motivation for committing it should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment D 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, may, so, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10544217687 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85238711749 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622448979592 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6567259677 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.083333333 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150355616567 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0570225999763 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446310829464 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0841168644905 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00903553723206 0.056905535591 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.