Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends.
It is tempting to view friends’ influence on the students as more effective because classmates always spend their spare time together. However, the further analysis shows that teachers are more influenced on the pupils due to their significant experience, authority in curriculum, and their age.
Clearly, students could be influenced by their educators because they provide tons of knowledge and skills from their previous background. For example, the teacher of science who has been working with children for 30 years could prepare many examples how curriculum could help kids in their real life. These examples are an integral part of learning process and teachers know all features of these tricks. It is essential to show connection between theoretical knowledge and practical skills to their students.
Moreover, frequently, teachers are older than their learners. Why is it essential for this topic? The answer is plain to see: educators provided students with their authority and deep understanding of the subject. For instance, the teachers who older than their pupils more than 20 years provide student’s respect and could influence to all subjects of learners’ educational process and extra-curriculum activities. It would be unwise to deny that age and considerable experience of working with young adults help establish a fantastic relationship between teacher and student. I dare say that age of the teachers is a mandatory aspect to be a great influencer to the students.
Nevertheless, on the other hand, friends could be influenced to the students as well. Undoubtedly, that students spend their wasted time together more than with their teachers. Friends do not provide their peers with tremendous experience or knowledge. In fact, friends could reach out to their classmates with other sides such as modern habits, contemporary games, and virtual behavior. A striking example could be an inappropriate kids’ behavior and cyber bulling in social media that try to repeat their friends because they believe that is is a good way to earn respect.
In the final analysis, it appears that teachers are more influenced on students that their friends. Furthermore, educators contribute many advantages to their learners, such as providing huge bunch of examples from their experience, understanding the nexus between the knowledge and life, and pressuring on the students by their age.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 60 | view |
| 2023-05-04 | Yam Kumar Oli | 60 | view |
| 2023-04-21 | rahmi88 | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-30 | sara.ana | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-21 | Umme Abiha | 60 | view |
- The reading states that one of the pictures by Rembrandt was not painted by him However the lecturer disagrees and claims that it was Rembrandt s 71
- It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject 71
- The graph show average CO2 emissions per person in the UK Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 61
- The reading passage suggests that R robustus was a scavenger However the professor contends that it a hunter 81
- The maps show changes that took place on the island 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 543, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: is
...their friends because they believe that is is a good way to earn respect. In the f...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, for example, for instance, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2042.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 374.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45989304813 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92017293866 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508021390374 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3049755037 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.473684211 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6842105263 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.68421052632 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.457360964502 0.236089414692 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169574293942 0.076458572812 222% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0945110918865 0.0737576698707 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.299975652507 0.150856017488 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529682640539 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.